The potential for vaccines to prevent the spread of infectious diseases is crucial for vaccination policy and ethics. In this paper, I discuss recent evidence that the current COVID-19 vaccines have only a modest and short-lived effect on reducing SARS-CoV-2 transmission and argue that this has at least four important ethical implications. First, getting vaccinated against COVID-19 should be seen primarily as a self-protective choice for individuals. Second, moral condemnation of unvaccinated people for causing direct harm to others is unjustified. Third, the case for a harm-based moral obligation to get vaccinated against COVID-19 is weak. Finally, and perhaps most significantly, coercive COVID-19 vaccination policies (e.g., measures that exclude unvaccinated people from society) cannot be directly justified by the harm principle.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9768787PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11673-022-10223-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

unvaccinated people
8
ethical significance
4
significance post-vaccination
4
post-vaccination covid-19
4
covid-19 transmission
4
transmission dynamics
4
dynamics potential
4
potential vaccines
4
vaccines prevent
4
prevent spread
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!