Background: Peer mentorship is a vital component of doctoral education; however, few studies describe peer mentorship in Doctor of Philosophy in Nursing (PhDN) programs.
Objectives: Explore characteristics, benefits, and challenges of peer mentorship experienced by PhD-N students.
Design: An electronic survey was sent to PhD-N program administrators at member institutions of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing in the United States. Contacts were asked to distribute the survey to current and recently graduated PhD-N students. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze participant demographics. Thematic analysis was used to analyze survey responses.
Results: Respondents (n = 213) provided perspectives from every PhD-N program phase, with 43.3 % (n = 91) pre-candidacy, 41.0 % (n = 86) candidacy, and 15.7 % (n = 33) recently graduated students. A total of 55.2 % (n = 117) received some form of peer mentorship. Thematic analysis revealed three peer mentorship levels (map, compass, first mate) representing varying degrees of emotional investment. Peer mentorship benefits included feeling connected to peers and the institution, strengthening research skills, and feeling supported. Barriers to peer mentorship include lack of time and institutional support, fear of burdening others, and poorly matched mentors.
Conclusion: Given that peer mentorship recipients reported feeling supported and less isolated, academic institutions should build a culture that promotes and supports peer mentorship. Future research should examine peer mentorship effects on PhD-N students' mental health, academic success, and faculty transition.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9916728 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105694 | DOI Listing |
South Med J
January 2025
From the Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, and Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia.
Effective early mentoring is essential for propelling academic careers. There is a growing cohort of junior faculty with advanced skills in medical education and research; these individuals need both mentoring and the opportunity to take on mentorship roles. Generalists who pursue advanced training in medical education or clinical research often enter junior faculty positions alongside recent residency graduates, leaving their skillset untapped.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Sports Act Living
December 2024
Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, United Kingdom.
Introduction: Physical activity interventions in deprived communities should acknowledge the social, political, and cultural context in which they are delivered. Targeted young leaders programs can harness positive youth development principles and address these concerns by engaging underrepresented young people and developing them as physical activity leaders who can support local delivery efforts. Community-based Youth Leadership development programs are under-researched, and little is known about how to develop young people from deprived communities as physical activity leaders.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNeurol Educ
December 2024
From the Department of Neurology (M.Q.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Department of Neurology (L.G., R.A.C.), Indiana University, Indianapolis; Department of Biostatistics (C.S.C.), University of Iowa, Iowa City; The Lunquist Institute (R.J.L.), Torrance, CA; and Departments of Emergency Medicine (C.M., W.J.M.), and Neurology (W.J.M.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
The Clinical Trials Methodology Course (CTMC), given from 2014 to 2023, was conducted to educate early-career clinical investigators from various backgrounds in neurosciences in the design of clinical trials and to provide mentorship to enhance academic careers and retention plus improve research productivity and the likelihood of successful grant applications. This summary describes the rationale, history, structure, and trainee outcomes of the CTMC. The course used small groups, consisting of 1-2 clinical faculty advisor(s), 1 faculty biostatistician, and 2-4 trainees who met remotely approximately weekly over 12 weeks.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
January 2025
Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Importance: Mentorship is increasingly recognized as a critical part of training across the spectrum of trainees. While explored more in-depth in the literature of other medical specialties, mentorship remains a nascent topic in the Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery (OHNS) literature.
Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the current literature on mentorship in OHNS.
Clin Teach
February 2025
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Background: Most postgraduate medical education tracks are faculty-led and emphasise teaching skills. A peer-to-peer medical education track focused on curriculum development and scholarship is notably underrepresented in the literature, especially within graduate medical education. To address these gaps, a 2-year Distinction in Medical Education (DIME) track was developed.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!