Background: The Covid-19 pandemic has increased stress levels in GPs, who have resorted to different coping strategies to deal with this crisis. Gender differences in coping styles may be contributing factors in the development of psychological distress.

Objectives: To identify differences by gender and by stress level in coping strategies of GPs during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Methods: A cross-sectional, web-based survey conducted with GPs in Catalonia (Spain), in June-July 2021. the institution's email distribution list, all GPs members of the Catalan Society of Family and Community Medicine were invited to complete a survey assessing sociodemographic, health and work-related characteristics, experienced stress (Stress scale of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales-DASS 21) and the frequency of use of a range of coping strategies (Brief-COPE) classified as problem-focused, emotion-focused and avoidant strategies, some of which are adaptive and others maladaptive. We compared the scores of each strategy by gender and stress level using Student's -test.

Results: Of 4739 members, 522 GPs participated in the study (response rate 11%; 79.1% women; mean age = 46.9 years,  = 10.5). Of these, 41.9% reported moderate-severe stress levels. The most common coping strategies were acceptance, active coping, planning, positive reframing and venting. More frequently than men, women resorted to emotional and instrumental support, venting, distraction and self-blame, whereas men used acceptance and humour more commonly than women. Moderate-severe stress levels were associated with non-adaptive coping, with increased use of avoidance strategies, self-blame, religion and venting, and decreased use of positive reframing and acceptance.

Conclusion: The most common coping strategies were adaptive and differed by gender. However, highly stressful situations caused maladaptive strategies to emerge.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10249454PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2022.2155135DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

coping strategies
20
stress levels
12
strategies
9
coping
9
stress
9
gender differences
8
covid-19 pandemic
8
gender stress
8
stress level
8
strategies adaptive
8

Similar Publications

Aim: To investigate the characteristics of psychological insulin resistance and dyadic coping in elderly diabetic patients and their spouses, and their association with insulin medication adherence.

Design: Observational, cross-sectional study.

Methods: A convenience sampling method selected 300 elderly diabetic patient-spouse pairs from a community.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Road safety is a critical concern worldwide, impacting individuals, communities, and societies. As mobility increases, so does the risk of accidents and injuries on roads, emphasizing the need for preventive measures. Road safety volunteers contribute significantly to promoting and maintaining road safety, making it important to understand their motivations and resilience sources.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Endometriosis is a prevalent chronic gynecological condition characterized by severe pelvic pain, negatively affecting women's health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The Common-Sense Model of Illness Self-regulation has revealed the importance of illness perceptions and coping strategies in explaining the impact of illness on HRQOL across several conditions. These aspects have never been assessed in endometriosis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic may have interfered with individuals' access to alcohol use disorder (AUD) treatment, but limited research has documented the impact of treatment interference on drinking behavior. This study's purpose was to examine the associations of AUD treatment interference with problematic alcohol use, and the moderating roles of perceived stress and resilience.

Method: A cross-sectional survey design was employed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Optimizing recovery in first-episode psychosis: A systematic review of psychosocial interventions.

Schizophr Res

December 2024

Department of Psychology, Indiana University Indianapolis, 402 N. Blackford St., Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA. Electronic address:

This systematic review evaluates the efficacy of psychosocial interventions for individuals experiencing first-episode psychosis (FEP) across multiple recovery outcomes. Drawing from 35 studies, the analysis synthesizes evidence on symptom reduction, social and role functioning improvement, continuity of care, hospitalization rates, and other psychological outcomes. Regarding symptom reduction, specialized FEP programs demonstrated decreases across positive, negative, and general symptoms.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!