A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The value of dual-energy spectral CT in differentiating solitary pulmonary tuberculosis and solitary lung adenocarcinoma. | LitMetric

Background: To explore the value of dual-energy spectral CT in distinguishing solitary pulmonary tuberculosis (SP-TB) from solitary lung adenocarcinoma (S-LUAD).

Methods: A total of 246 patients confirmed SP-TB (n = 86) or S-LUAD (n = 160) were retrospectively included. Spectral CT parameters include CT value, CT value, iodine concentration (IC), water concentration (WC), effective atomic number (Zeff), and spectral curve slope (λ). Data were measured during the arterial phase (AP) and venous phase (VP). Chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables, Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare continuous variables, and a two-sample -test was used to compare spectral CT parameters. ROC curves were used to calculate diagnostic efficiency.

Results: There were significant differences in spectral CT quantitative parameters (including CT value [all 0.001] , CT value [all 0.001], λ [ 0.001, and = 0.027], Zeff [0.015, and = 0.001], and IC [0.002, and = 0.028]) between the two groups during the AP and VP. However, WC ( 0.930, and = 0.823) was not statistically different between the two groups. The ROC curve analysis showed that the AUC in the AP and VP was 90.9% (95% CI, 0.873-0.945) and 83.4% (95% CI, 0.780-0.887), respectively. The highest diagnostic performance (AUC, 97.6%; 95% CI, 0.961-0.991) was achieved when all spectral CT parameters were combined with clinical variables.

Conclusion: Dual-energy spectral CT has a significant value in distinguishing SP-TB from S-LUAD.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9748684PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1000028DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dual-energy spectral
12
spectral parameters
12
solitary pulmonary
8
pulmonary tuberculosis
8
solitary lung
8
lung adenocarcinoma
8
spectral distinguishing
8
sp-tb s-luad
8
test compare
8
[all 0001]
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!