Unlabelled: Why do some international organizations (IO) accrete delegated authority over time while in others delegation is static or declines? We hypothesize that the dynamics of delegation are shaped by an IO's founding contract. IOs rooted in an open-ended contract have the capacity to discover cooperation over time: as new problems arise these IOs can adopt new policies or strengthen collaboration in existing areas. This, in turn, triggers a demand for delegation. However, this logic is mediated by the political regime of the IO. In predominantly democratic IOs, delegation is constrained by politicization which intensifies as an IO's policy portfolio broadens. These claims are tested using an updated version of the dataset covering 41 regional IOs between 1950 and 2019. Controlling for alternative explanations and addressing potential endogeneity across a range of model specifications, we find robust support for our argument.

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11558-022-09482-0.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9748392PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11558-022-09482-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

international organizations
8
discovering cooperation
4
cooperation endogenous
4
endogenous change
4
change international
4
organizations unlabelled
4
unlabelled international
4
organizations accrete
4
accrete delegated
4
delegated authority
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!