Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Purpose: To compare the efficacy of 0.1 % w/w Liposomal Amphotericin-B gel with 10 % w/w Povidone-Iodine and saline nasal douching in preventing revision surgery in patients with CAM.
Study Design: Multi-arm, parallel randomized control trial.
Study Setting: The trial was conducted in the Department of ENT, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) Bhubaneswar.
Methods: Participants: Microbiologically and histologically proven cases of mucormycosis who underwent surgical debridement were included in the study.
Interventions: Postoperatively, patients were randomized into three groups based on the type of topical intervention received, in the form of Lipid-based Amphotericin B gel, povidone‑iodine ointment or saline nasal douching.
Outcome: Requirement of revision surgery in postoperative cases of CAM.
Randomization: Participants were allotted to one of the three arms by block randomization.
Blinding: Single-blinded trial.
Results: Numbers randomized: 15 participants were randomized to each group. Recruitment: Completed recruiting. Numbers analyzed: 15 participants were analyzed in each group.
Outcomes: Control arm's risk of revision surgery was 4.50 (95 % CI: 1.16-17.44) times than Lipid-based Amphotericin B gel arm and 1.50 (95 % CI: 0.71-3.16) times that of the Povidone- Iodine arm. The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.02) for Amphotericin but not for Povidone-Iodine.
Conclusions: Topical Amphotericin-B gel application in the postoperative cavity can decrease the need for revision surgery and help in early recovery.
Trial Registration: CTRI/2021/10/037257. Clinical Trials Registry of India.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103702 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!