AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study examines how the flow of blood (Q) relates to the area of the aortic valve opening (AVA) through different echocardiographic stress tests, particularly low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE), to distinguish between pseudo-severe and true severe aortic stenosis.
  • - Three progressively intense stress maneuvers (passive leg raise, maximal dobutamine infusion, and their combination) were tested on 45 patients, revealing that while Q increased significantly, AVA showed signs of saturation, evidenced by a decrease in AVA and valve compliance.
  • - The analysis indicated that the relationship between Q and AVA conforms more closely to a saturating model rather than a linear one

Article Abstract

We analyzed the relationship between flow (Q) and aortic valve opening area (AVA) using a sequence of echocardiographic stress tests of increasing strength. Low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) has been used to differentiate pseudo-severe from true severe aortic stenoses. Because the Q-response to DSE is so variable between individuals, AVA has been projected to a standardized flow (AVA) using linear interpolation. A linear Q-to-AVA relation implies that AVA shows an unconstrained increase. We applied three stress maneuvers of increasing strength to investigate whether AVA shows signs of saturation. We performed an echocardiographic examination at rest, during the passive leg raise maneuver ("PLR"), maximal dobutamine infusion ("Dmax"), and their combination ("Dmax + PLR") in 45 patients with severe low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis. We analyzed the effect of the stress maneuver on Q, AVA, valve compliance (VC), and AVA. We also compared the proportion of patients with nonconclusive test (ΔQ < 20%) between stress maneuvers. We computed the Akaike information criterion (AIC) to compare a linear with a saturating function for the Q-AVA relation. Q gradually increased from "PLR" to "Dmax" to "Dmax + PLR" ( < 0.0001), whereas the number of nonconclusive tests concomitantly diminished from = 35 to = 3. The stress sequence increased AVA ( < 0.001) but decreased AVA ( = 0.006) and VC ( = 0.005). In the pooled Q-AVA data, the AIC value was lower for the saturating (sigmoidal) model compared with the linear model fitting (-1,593 vs. -1,504). "Dmax + PLR" is capable of reducing the number of nonconclusive DSE tests. With increasing stress strength, the Q-AVA relation progressively flattens, indicating saturation. The relation between transaortic flow (Q) and aortic valve opening area (AVA) shows a saturation when three different stress maneuvers are used to increase Q as much as possible. This has implications for the assessment of aortic stenosis severity.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00449.2022DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

aortic stenosis
12
stress maneuvers
12
"dmax plr"
12
ava
10
low-flow low-gradient
8
low-gradient aortic
8
stenosis analyzed
8
flow aortic
8
aortic valve
8
valve opening
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!