A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Baseline immune signature score of Tregs × HLA-DRCD4 T cells × PD1CD8 T cells predicts outcome to immunotherapy in cancer patients. | LitMetric

Background: The use of immunotherapy (IT) is rapidly increasing across different tumor entities. PD-L1 expression is primarily used for therapy evaluation. The disadvantages of PD-L1 status are spatial and temporal heterogeneity as well as tumor type-dependent variation of predictive value. To optimize patient selection for IT, new prediction markers for therapy success are needed. Based on the systemic efficacy of IT, we dissected the immune signature of peripheral blood as an easily accessible predictive biomarker for therapeutic success.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective clinical study of 62 cancer patients treated with IT. We assessed peripheral immune cell counts before the start of IT flow cytometry. The predictive value for therapy response of developed immune signature scores was tested by ROC curve analyses and scores were correlated with time to progression (TTP).

Results: High score values of "Tregs ÷ (CD4/CD8 ratio)" (Score A) and high score values of "Tregs × HLA-DRCD4 T cells × PD1CD8 T cells" (Score B) significantly correlated with response at first staging ( = 0.001; < 0.001). At the optimal cutoff point, Score A correctly predicted 79.1% and Score B correctly predicted 89.3% of the staging results (sensitivity: 86.2%, 90.0%; specificity: 64.3%, 87.5%). A high Score A and Score B statistically correlated with prolonged median TTP (6.13 . 2.17 months, = 0.025; 6.43 . 1.83 months, = 0.016). Cox regression analyses for TTP showed a risk reduction of 55.7% (HR = 0.44, = 0.029) for Score A and an adjusted risk reduction of 73.2% (HR = 0.27, = 0.016) for Score B.

Conclusion: The two identified immune signature scores showed high predictive value for therapy response as well as for prolonged TTP in a pan-cancer patient population. Our scores are easy to determine by using peripheral blood and flow cytometry, apply to different cancer entities, and allow an outcome prediction before the start of IT.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9742462PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.1054161DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

immune signature
16
high score
12
score
11
hla-drcd4 cells
8
cells pd1cd8
8
cancer patients
8
peripheral blood
8
flow cytometry
8
predictive therapy
8
therapy response
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!