Introduction: The bowel preparation before elective colorectal surgery is a controversial topic in the surgical practice. During the last 15 years numerous publications concerning the necessity and options of the bowel preparation were published. The aim of our team was to perform a survey about the current, domestic practice as well as to give a short overview of the relevant literature and recommendations.
Methods: 50 surgical departments performing colorectal surgeries routinely were asked to fill out an online, anonymous survey. The data of the survey filled out by 40 surgical departments were analyzed separately for the surgeries of the right colon, the left colon, and the rectum.
Results: Based on the results, there is a high heterogeneity concerning the mode of the bowel preparation: in case of the right colon 7 different combinations, in case of the left colon and rectum 3-3 different combinations of bowel preparation methods are used.
Conclusions: In the current domestic practice there is a high heterogeneity regarding the modes of the bowel preparation before the elective colorectal surgery, which are presumably based mainly on individual experience. The methods of the bowel preparation used by the majority of the surgical centers are not in accordance with the current international recommendations. A preparation of a Hungarian consensus document in this topic would be beneficial.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/1046.2022.40001 | DOI Listing |
Dig Liver Dis
January 2025
Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168, Roma, Italy.
Background And Aims: Adenoma detection rate (ADR) serves as a primary quality metric in colonoscopy. Various computer-aided detection (CADe) tools have emerged, yielding diverse impacts on ADR across different demographic cohorts. This study aims to evaluate a new CADe system in patients undergoing colonoscopy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: To describe our experience with anorectal malformation (ARM) patients, while analyzing complications and risk factors.
Materials And Methods: A retrospective study of ARM patients aged 0-18 years old undergoing surgery from 2006 to 2023 was carried out. Demographic variables, associated malformations, age and repair surgery operating times, presence and type of colostomy, previous intestinal preparation, and presence and type of surgical complications -intestinal occlusion, anal prolapse, stenosis, bleeding, dehiscence, extrusion, anoplasty misposition, urethral perforation, and stomal complications- were collected.
Gynecol Oncol Rep
February 2025
Dept of Surgical Oncology, Aster International Institute of Oncology, Bangalore, India.
Background: The role of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in cytoreductive surgery and/or Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy HIPEC) is evolving, with promising results that improve patient outcomes. This consensus exercise was carried out to address and standardize components of the ERAS protocol pertinent to the Indian context.
Method: The modified Delphi method was employed with two rounds of voting.
World J Gastroenterol
January 2025
Department of Gastroenterology (Endoscopy Center), China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130033, Jilin Province, China.
The term "gut microbiota" primarily refers to the ecological community of various microorganisms in the gut, which constitutes the largest microbial community in the human body. Although adequate bowel preparation can improve the results of colonoscopy, it may interfere with the gut microbiota. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy can lead to transient changes in the gut microbiota, potentially affecting an individual's health, especially in vulnerable populations, such as patients with inflammatory bowel disease.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFContemp Clin Trials
January 2025
Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA; Center for Vulnerable Populations, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA; School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA. Electronic address:
Background: Fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is a widely used first step for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Abnormal FIT results require a colonoscopy for screening completion and CRC diagnosis, but the rate of timely colonoscopy is low, especially among patients in safety-net settings. Multi-level factors at the clinic- and patient-levels influence colonoscopy completion after an abnormal FIT.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!