AI Article Synopsis

Article Abstract

Adverse outcome pathway (AOP)-based computational models provide state-of-the-art prediction for human skin sensitizers and are promising alternatives to animal testing. However, little is known about their applicability to pesticides due to scarce pesticide data for evaluation. Moreover, pesticides traditionally have been tested on animals without human data, making validation difficult. Direct application of AOP-based models to pesticides may be inappropriate since their original applicability domains were designed to maximize reliability for human response prediction on diverse chemicals but not pesticides. This study proposed to identify a consensus chemical space with concordant human responses predicted by the SkinSensPred online tool and animal testing data to reduce animal testing. The identified consensus chemical space for non-sensitizers achieved high concordance of 85% and 100% for the cross-validation and independent test, respectively. The reconfigured SkinSensPred can be applied as the first-tier tool for identifying non-sensitizers to reduce. animal testing for pesticides by 19.6%.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9716044PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1584/jpestics.D22-043DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

animal testing
16
online tool
8
consensus chemical
8
chemical space
8
reduce animal
8
pesticides
6
reconfiguring online
4
tool skinsenspred
4
skinsenspred predicting
4
predicting skin
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!