A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Concurrent Validity and Reliability of Devices to Measure Jump Height in Men's Handball Players. | LitMetric

Unlabelled: Although there is a wide range of validated devices to measure vertical jump height, the degree of interchangeability among them is currently unknown.

Aims: The purpose of this study was to examine the concurrent validity and reliability of multiple devices to measure jump height in men's handball players.

Methods: Sixteen players (age = 24.0 ± 3.7 years old) performed three types of jumps (n= 144-squat jump (SJ), countermovement jump (CMJ) and Abalakov jump (ABK)) on a contact platform (CHRONOJUMP) while simultaneously being measured with two inertial devices (WIMU and VERT) and recorded with a high-speed camera. Vertical jump height was analyzed according to each type of jump.

Results: The t-test showed statistically significant differences ( = 0.001) between the contact platform (reference standard) and the rest of the tools that tended to overestimate jump height in all jumps. SJ and CMJ proved to be the jump tests with the most stable reliability values in all devices (ICC: 0.92-0.98), except in the comparison with VERT.

Conclusions: Although all the analyzed devices proved to be valid and reliable in previous studies, they are not interchangeable. Therefore, it is suggested to always use the same type of device to evaluate vertical height jump.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9738152PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22239070DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

jump height
20
devices measure
12
jump
10
concurrent validity
8
validity reliability
8
measure jump
8
height men's
8
men's handball
8
vertical jump
8
contact platform
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!