AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to evaluate how penicillin allergies are assessed in patients visiting dental clinics, focusing on those with documented allergies.
  • Researchers conducted a chart review of patients who received different non-penicillin antibiotics to categorize the nature and severity of their allergies and determine testing eligibility.
  • Findings revealed a significant percentage of patients lacked documentation of their allergic reactions, with many eligible for skin testing or oral challenges, highlighting a need for better allergy assessment practices in dental settings.

Article Abstract

Objective: To evaluate opportunities for assessing penicillin allergies among patients presenting to dental clinics.

Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study.

Setting: VA dental clinics.

Patients: Adult patients with a documented penicillin allergy who received an antibiotic from a dentist between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2018, were included.

Methods: Chart reviews were completed on random samples of 100 patients who received a noncephalosporin antibiotic and 200 patients who received a cephalosporin. Each allergy was categorized by severity. These categories were used to determine patient eligibility for 3 testing groups based on peer-reviewed algorithms: (1) no testing, (2) skin testing, and (3) oral test-dose challenge. Descriptive and bivariate statistics were used to compare facility and patient demographics first between true penicillin allergy, pseudo penicillin allergy, and missing allergy documentation, and between those who received a cephalosporin and those who did not at the dental visit.

Results: Overall, 19% lacked documentation of the nature of allergic reaction, 53% were eligible for skin testing, 27% were eligible for an oral test-dose challenge, and 1% were contraindicated from testing. Male patients and African American patients were less likely to receive a cephalosporin.

Conclusions: Most penicillin-allergic patients in the VA receiving an antibiotic from a dentist are eligible for penicillin skin testing or an oral penicillin challenge. Further research is needed to understand the role of dentists and dental clinics in assessing penicillin allergies.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9726497PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2022.18DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

penicillin allergy
16
skin testing
12
dental clinics
8
assessing penicillin
8
penicillin allergies
8
antibiotic dentist
8
patients received
8
received cephalosporin
8
testing oral
8
oral test-dose
8

Similar Publications

How can we remove erroneous penicillin allergy labels?

Evid Based Dent

January 2025

Public Health Directorate, NHS Lanarkshire, Kirklands, Fallside Road, Bothwell, G71 8BB, UK.

Objectives: To evaluate the use of the Penicillin Allergy Reassessment for Treatment Improvement (PARTI) tool in supporting appropriate penicillin allergy labelling in dental practices.

Design: Parallel mixed methods study.

Methods: Focus groups of patients with documented penicillin allergies and healthcare worker targeted questionnaires were used in gathering feedback on the PARTI tool's design and functionality.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Allergy to beta-lactam antibiotics (BLA), especially to penicillin, is the most commonly reported drug allergy by patients. Alternative antibiotics can yield negative consequences, such as extended hospitalization days due to less efficacy and overall higher costs. The basophil activation test (BAT) is an assay, in which activation of an individual's own basophils is quantified by flow cytometry.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Characteristics, risk factors and clinical impact of penicillin and other antibiotic allergies in adults in the UK General Practice: a population-based cohort study.

J Infect

January 2025

Centre for Medicines Optimisation Research and Education, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Research Department of Practice and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Centre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Laboratory of Data Discovery for Health (D24H), Hong Kong Science Park, Hong Kong.

Objective: To assess the characteristics, risk factors and clinical impact of penicillin and other antibiotic allergies labels in general practice in the UK.

Design: Population-based cohort study.

Setting: Primary care in the UK, 2000-2018.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A Guide to Pediatric Antibiotic Allergy Testing: A Report from the United States Drug Allergy Registry.

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract

January 2025

Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Pediatric antibiotic labels are common, and unnecessary antibiotic avoidance is associated with negative personal and public health outcomes; as a result, there is an increasing emphasis on the importance of pediatric antibiotic allergy evaluations. Different testing strategies have been advised, including skin testing and challenge testing with varied doses and duration. Established consensus testing protocols are lacking.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!