AI Article Synopsis

  • The study explored how osmolarity measurements for dry eye disease (DED) correlate between TearLab™ and I-Pen® systems in overweight individuals.
  • Results indicated that subjects with high BMI had significantly higher OSDI and osmolarity scores compared to a control group, with a strong correlation (r = 0.934) between the two measurement systems.
  • The research concluded that I-Pen® delivered higher osmolarity readings than TearLab™, showing notable variation in measurements among subjects with high BMI.

Article Abstract

Background: Osmolarity is used to detect symptoms of dry eye disease (DED) and can be measured using TearLab™ and I-Pen® systems.

Objectives: To investigate the correlation between osmolarity measurements using the TearLab™ and I-Pen® systems in subjects with a high body mass index (BMI).

Material And Methods: Thirty male subjects with a high BMI (27-48 kg/m2; 23.3 ±2.1 years old) participated in this study. The control group consisting of 30 healthy males (24.9 kg/m2; 22.9 ±2.1 years old) was also enrolled. Osmolarity measurements were recorded from the right eye using the TearLab™ and I-Pen® systems, and interviews were conducted to determine ocular surface disease index (OSDI) scores.

Results: The OSDI (p = 0.042), TearLab™ (p < 0.001) and I-Pen® (p < 0.001) scores were significantly higher in the study group than in the control group. In the study group, OSDI scores ranged from 2 to 16 (median 8.0, interquartile range (IQR) 6.8), while it was from 0 to 10 (median 6.3, IQR 4.1) in the control group. The TearLab™ osmolarity scores were in the range of 278-309 mOsm/L in the study group, whereas the I-Pen® osmolarity measurements were in the range of 294-336 mOsm/L in the study group, compared with 263-304 mOsm/L and 278-317 mOsm/L in the control group, respectively. In the study group, there was a strong correlation between the TearLab™ and I-Pen® osmolarity scores (r = 0.934; p = 0.001). In addition, strong correlations were found between the BMI and both TearLab™ (r = 0.736; p = 0.001) and I-Pen® (r = 0.707; p = 0.001) scores, as well as between the OSDI scores and both TearLab™ (r = 0.731; p = 0.001) and I-Pen® measurements (r = 0.666; p = 0.001).

Conclusion: Osmolarity measurements using the I-Pen® system were significantly higher than those recorded using the TearLab™ system in subjects with a high BMI. The I-Pen® measurements showed large variations in osmolarity scores and were highly unreliable in correctly identifying normal eyes compared to the TearLab™ system. Also, a strong correlation was found between the osmolarity scores obtained from the TearLab™ and I-Pen® systems.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.17219/acem/156645DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tearlab™ i-pen®
24
osmolarity measurements
20
study group
20
i-pen® systems
16
subjects high
16
control group
16
osmolarity scores
16
correlation osmolarity
12
tearlab™
12
i-pen®
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!