Study Design: Descriptive study.

Objectives: The study's main objective was to describe the common targets of phenol neurolysis and review the safety and efficacy of the dose used for this spasticity management procedure in people with spinal cord injury (SCI).

Setting: An acute rehabilitation hospital.

Methods: Data from people with SCI who underwent phenol neurolysis procedures for spasticity management between April 2017 and August 2018 were included in this study. We collected demographics and phenol neurolysis procedure-related information.

Results: A total of 66 people with SCI and spasticity underwent phenol neurolysis of 303 nerves over 102 encounters. During these encounters, 97% of procedures were performed using both electrical stimulation and ultrasound guidance. The median (IQR) total volume of 6% aqueous phenol used per encounter was 4.0 (2.0-6.0) ml with a median (IQR) of 1.5 (1.0-2.3) ml per nerve. The most frequent target was the obturator nerve (33%), followed by the pectoral nerves (23%). Immediate post-phenol neurolysis improvement or reduction in spasticity was reported for 92% of all documented encounters. There was no documentation of any post-procedure-related adverse events in this cohort during this specified time frame.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that phenol neurolysis can be safely used to manage spasticity in people with SCI under combined electrical stimulation and ultrasound guidance. Further research is required to assess the procedure's safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness on patient-reported outcomes compared to other spasticity interventions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9732339PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41394-022-00556-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

phenol neurolysis
24
people sci
12
people spinal
8
spinal cord
8
cord injury
8
safety efficacy
8
spasticity management
8
underwent phenol
8
electrical stimulation
8
stimulation ultrasound
8

Similar Publications

Background: Because of the limitations of pharmacological therapy, nonpharmacological therapies including intervention procedures are also important for quality of cancer pain management.

Objective: To clarify the availability of, number performed, barriers to performing, and educational practices of four interventional procedures (celiac plexus neurolysis/splanchnic nerve neurolysis, phenol saddle block, epidural analgesia, and intrathecal analgesia) in designated cancer hospitals.

Design: Cross-sectional survey.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A commonly applied analgesic therapy for patients with severe abdominal pain due to cancer-related pain in the upper abdomen, is coeliac plexus neurolysis (CPN). Herein, a combination product of phenol and an iodine contrast agent are injected simultaneously. The chemical stability of such a combination product is unknown, and no chromatographic method is yet available that describes the simultaneous quantification of phenol and iomeprol.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Chemical neurolysis of the genicular nerves offers a potential treatment for chronic, non-cancer knee pain, as reviewed in a study analyzing various research findings.
  • The scoping review included 8 studies (192 patients) examining the effects of chemical neurolysis using either phenol or alcohol, with positive outcomes for pain relief and functionality reported across the board.
  • However, due to variability in study designs and small sample sizes, more high-quality randomized controlled trials are necessary to enhance the understanding of this treatment approach and to compare it with other pain management strategies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!