AI Article Synopsis

  • Animal manure is a source of important nutrients but loses nitrogen as ammonia during storage, impacting health and the environment.
  • In an experiment, biochars made from miscanthus and anaerobic digestate, as well as lightweight expanded clay (LECA), were tested to see if they could reduce ammonia emissions during four months of manure storage.
  • Acid-activated biochars significantly decreased ammonia emissions by 37-51% in the first month and 25-28% over the entire storage period, while LECA reduced emissions by 21%, indicating that activated biochars are more effective at mitigating emissions compared to LECA.

Article Abstract

Animal manure contains valuable plant nutrients which need to be stored until field application. A significant proportion of slurry nitrogen is volatilized in the form of ammonia (NH) during storage. This impacts human health, biodiversity, air and water quality and thus urgent action is needed to reduce NH emissions. In this experiment, we evaluated the NH emission mitigation potential of biochars derived from miscanthus (MB) and solid separated anaerobic digestate (DB), and orthophosphoric acid activated MB (AMB) and DB (ADB) as well as lightweight expanded clay aggregate (LECA) during four months of liquid manure storage. A slurry without amendment was included as a control (Ctrl). Acid activated and non-activated biochars were applied on top of the slurry maintaining a 7 mm thick surface layer, while LECA was applied in a 2 cm thick layer. NH emissions were measured by photoacoustic analyzer. In comparison to Ctrl, acid activated biochar decreased (p < 0.05) NH emissions during the slurry storage. Activated biochar reduced the emissions by 37-51% within the first month of slurry storage and achieved a 25-28% emissions reduction efficiency throughout the four month period due to the reduction in emission mitigation efficiency as the storage period progressed. LECA reduced NH emissions by 21% during storage. Losses of NH as a percentage of total ammoniacal N were 29-31% for activated biochars, 35-39% for non-activated biochars and 33% for LECA. In conclusion, acid activated biochars and LECA could be good floating-covers to mitigate NH emissions during manure storage, but activated biochars may have better mitigation potential than LECA.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120815DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

acid activated
16
activated biochar
8
manure storage
8
ctrl acid
8
biochar acid
4
activated
4
biochar ammonia
4
ammonia emissions
4
emissions manure
4
storage animal
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!