Mothership vs. drip-and-ship: evaluation of initial treatment strategies for acute ischemic stroke in a well-developed network of specialized hospitals.

Purpose: Two strategies of initial patient care exist in endovascular thrombectomy (ET) depending on the site of initial admission: the mothership (MS) and drip-and-ship (DnS) principles. This study compares both strategies in regard to patient outcome in a local network of specialized hospitals.

Methods: Two-hundred-and-two patients undergoing ET in anterior circulation ischemic stroke between June 2016 and May 2018 were enrolled. Ninety two patients were directly admitted to our local facility (MS), One-hundred-and-ten were secondarily referred to our facility. Group comparisons between admission strategies in three-months modified Rankin Scale (mRS), Maas Score and Alberta-Stroke-Program-Early-computed-tomography-score (ASPECTS), National-Institutes-of-Health-Stroke-Scale (NIHSS), age and onset-to-recanalization-time were performed. Correlation between admission strategy and mRS was calculated. A binary logistic regression model was computed including mRS as dependent variable.

Results: There were neither significant group differences in three-months mRS between MS and DnS nor significant correlations. Patients tended to achieve a better outcome with DnS. Collateralization status differed between MS and DnS (p = 0.003) with better collateralization in DnS. There were no significant group differences in NIHSS or ASPECTS but in onset-to-recanalization-time (p < 0.001) between MS and DnS. Binary logistic regression showed a high explanation of variance of mRS but no significant results for admission strategy.

Conclusions: Functional outcome in patients treated with ET is comparable between the MS and DnS principles. Tendentially better outcome in the DnS subgroup may be explained by selection bias due to a higher willingness to apply ET in patients with worse baseline conditions (e.g. worse collateralization), if patients undergoing MS are already on site.