Evaluation of the Processes and Outcomes of a Physician Leadership Program: The Continuous Feedback Loop Design.

J Contin Educ Health Prof

Dr. Gregg M. Gascon: Adjunct Assistant Professor, Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. Dr. Huey T. Chen: Professor of the Department of Public Health and Director of the Center for Applied Research and Evaluation in the College of Health Professions, Mercer University, Atlanta, GA. Ms. Liliana Morosanu: Instructor and Coordinator, Program and Student Academic Advancement in the College of Health Professions, Mercer University, Atlanta, GA. Dr. Victor H. Chen: Lecturer, Department of Management, University of North Texas, Denton, TX. Dr. Phil Cass: Director, Physicians Leadership Academy, Columbus, OH. Dr. Robert Falcone: CEO, Columbus Medical Association and its Affiliates, 1390 Dublin Road, Columbus, OH.

Published: October 2022

Introduction: Physicians assume leadership roles in their health care organizations and practices often without support or training. The Physicians Leadership Academy provides integrated leadership seminars, mindfulness training, and executive coaching in a 10-month curriculum to physicians across area organizations.

Methods: Program evaluators responded to stakeholders' need for continuous program improvement by developing a continuous feedback loop evaluation design incorporating a program monitoring system and a theory-driven program evaluation. Given the size of the 2019 to 20 cohort ( n = 19), a one-group pretest/posttest design was used to assess the mechanisms of the program (mindfulness and wellbeing) along with knowledge development, emotional intelligence, and personal and professional growth. The assessments used a combination of published and administrator-developed assessments to address the unique aspects of the program. Doing such ensured continuous improvement and sustainability for the program.

Results: The cohort of physicians demonstrated significant engagement and learning across the curriculum, improved mindfulness, and improved capacity of the providers to affect their health care system and communities.

Conclusions: The utility of the program was demonstrated through quantitative and qualitative analyses. Implications of the methodology for future evaluations of program developments are discussed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000436DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

program
9
continuous feedback
8
feedback loop
8
health care
8
evaluation processes
4
processes outcomes
4
outcomes physician
4
leadership
4
physician leadership
4
leadership program
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!