AI Article Synopsis

  • Rodent models serve as a potential alternative to larger animal models for studying peri-implantitis, but their validity is debated due to unclear morphological and biochemical characteristics.
  • A systematic review assessed research on marginal bone loss (MBL) in rodents after peri-implantitis was induced using various methods, with 23 studies included after analyzing 1,014 records.
  • The meta-analysis found MBL estimates of 0.25 mm in mice and 0.26 mm in rats, highlighting pronounced circumferential bone loss associated with experimental peri-implantitis.

Article Abstract

Purpose: Rodent models have emerged as an alternative to established larger animal models for peri-implantitis research. However, the construct validity of rodent models is controversial due to a lack of consensus regarding their histological, morphological, and biochemical characteristics. This systematic review sought to validate rodent models by characterizing their morphological changes, particularly marginal bone loss (MBL), a hallmark of peri-implantitis.

Methods: This review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. A literature search was performed electronically using MEDLINE (PubMed), and Embase, identifying pre-clinical studies reporting MBL after experimental peri-implantitis induction in rodents. Each study's risk of bias was assessed using the Systematic Review Center for Laboratory animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) risk of bias tool. A meta-analysis was performed for the difference in MBL, comparing healthy implants to those with experimental peri-implantitis.

Results: Of the 1,014 unique records retrieved, 23 studies that met the eligibility criteria were included. Peri-implantitis was induced using 4 methods: ligatures, lipopolysaccharide, microbial infection, and titanium particles. Studies presented high to unclear risks of bias. During the osseointegration phase, 11.6% and 6.4%-11.3% of implants inserted in mice and rats, respectively, had failed to osseointegrate. Twelve studies were included in the meta-analysis of the linear MBL measured using micro-computed tomography. Following experimental peri-implantitis, the MBL was estimated to be 0.25 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14-0.36 mm) in mice and 0.26 mm (95% CI, 0.19-0.34 mm) in rats. The resulting peri-implant MBL was circumferential, consisting of supra- and infrabony components.

Conclusions: Experimental peri-implantitis in rodent models results in circumferential MBL, with morphology consistent with the clinical presentation of peri-implantitis. While rodent models are promising, there is still a need to further characterize their healing potentials, standardize experiment protocols, and improve the reporting of results and methodology.

Trial Registration: PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42020209776.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9807853PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2200900045DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rodent models
20
systematic review
12
experimental peri-implantitis
12
morphological changes
8
risk bias
8
peri-implantitis rodent
8
models
7
mbl
7
rodent
6
peri-implantitis
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!