Background: Unilateral pedicle screw fixation several advantages, including reduced trauma and low cost. However, its stability and safety have not been widely recognized. In this study, the biomechanical differences in the vertebral body and screw-rod system after unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation were compared using both the finite element model and calf lumbar model.

Method: We used the verified finite element model to establish unilateral and bilateral posterior lumbar surgery models. The biomechanical data of different parts of the models were recorded under different working states. Then, three calf lumbar models were selected to simulate different working states with the help of a universal testing machine and other instruments. Finally, the biomechanical data of the screw-rod system were obtained from a static strain test and analysis system.

Results: By analyzing and comparing biomechanical data obtained using two different methods, this study found that unilateral pedicle screw fixation does not bring excessive loads to the lumbar spine and screw-rod system.

Conclusion: From the perspective of biomechanics, unilateral pedicle screw fixation is considered a safe and reliable implantation technique.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9713276PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11621DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pedicle screw
20
screw fixation
20
unilateral pedicle
16
biomechanical data
12
screw-rod system
8
unilateral bilateral
8
finite element
8
element model
8
calf lumbar
8
working states
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!