Comparison of three methods of EPR retrospective dosimetry in watch glass.

Front Public Health

Institute of Nanotechnology and Materials Engineering, Faculty of Applied Physics and Mathematics, Gdańsk University of Technology, Gdańsk, Poland.

Published: December 2022

In this article we present results of our follow-up studies of samples of watch glass obtained and examined within a framework of international intercomparison dosimetry project RENEB ILC 2021. We present three methods of dose reconstruction based on EPR measurements of these samples: calibration method (CM), added dose method (ADM) and added dose&heating method (ADHM). The study showed that the three methods of dose reconstruction gave reliable and similar results in 0.5-6.0 Gy dose range, with accuracy better than 10%. The ADHM is the only one applicable in a real scenario, when sample-specific background spectrum is not available; therefore, a positive verification of this method is important for future use of EPR dosimetry in glass in potential radiation accidents.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9714545PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1063769DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

three methods
12
watch glass
8
methods dose
8
dose reconstruction
8
comparison three
4
methods epr
4
epr retrospective
4
retrospective dosimetry
4
dosimetry watch
4
glass article
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!