Interest of surgical vascular reconstructions aiming at preserving hemodialysis access.

Background: Vascular hemodialysis access is a very precious asset for patients with end-stage renal failure. Ideally complications in these accesses should be detected early in order to treat them in time. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of vascular reconstructions to preserve the vascular access for hemodialysis and to examine their benefits in terms of conserving the venous network, using hemodialysis catheters, time of cannulation after surgery, patency and postoperative morbi-mortality, by comparing them to those of newly created arterio-venous fistula (AVF).

Methods: This was a retrospective, descriptive and comparative study, performed from September 2012 to February 2015. It concerned patients operated for complications of their native AVF. Two groups were compared: reconstructed AVF (group 1) and newly created AVF (group 2). Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, preoperative clinical and paraclinical data, surgical techniques and outcomes were recorded. This data was analyzed and compared between the two groups.

Results: We collected 151 surgical interventions divided into two groups: 55 surgical reconstructions and 96 new AVF. The average age was 59.9±1.3 years [19.1-88.9], with a male predominance (59.6%). The two groups were comparable in terms of age, gender and comorbidities. Reconstructions were mostly indicated for stenosis (47.3%) and new vascular accesses for venous thrombosis (92.7%). Reconstruction had significantly better successful exploitation rates (95.7%) and time of cannulation (26.6 days) (respectively P=0.025 and P=0.000). Its primary failure rate was null. Its primary patency and primary functional patency were respectively 94.2% and 97.7% at 1 month and 82.2% and 87.1% at 2 years. Morbidity's global rates were comparable between both groups (41.8% vs. 43.8%). The rates of early morbidity and stenosis were significantly higher for reconstructions (respectively P=0.037 and P=0.047), while late morbidity and thrombosis' rates were significantly higher for new AVF (respectively P=0.021 and P=0.023). Mid-term permeabilities were better for reconstructions, but the differences were not statistically significant.

Conclusion: Surgical reconstructions seem to be an effective alternative for the treatment of complicated AVF. Our results appear to be comparable to those of the literature. The benefits of these surgical techniques in terms of conserving venous network, use of hemodialysis catheters, time for cannulation after surgery, patency and postoperative morbi-mortality appear to be undeniable.