Retrospective evaluation of radiological and clinical outcomes after surgical treatment of proximal femur fractures utilizing TFNA.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients treated with the TFN-Advanced™ Proximal Femoral Nailing system (TFNA¸ DePuy Synthes, West Chester, PA) including intra- and postoperative complications.

Materials And Methods: All patients with an acute proximal femur fracture consequently treated with a TFNA between September 2014 and December 2018 were evaluated. Clinical and radiological data were assessed for intra- and postoperative complications, including treatment failure. In addition, intra- and postoperative X-rays were used to determine the position of the implant, and any migration, via tip-apex-distance (TAD) and the caput-collum-diaphyseal angle (CCD). The accuracy of the fracture reduction was rated by both observers according to Baumgartners criteria.

Results: 275 consecutive patients (mean age 77.5 ± 14.1; 70.2% female) were included. The predominant OTA/AO fracture classification was 31A2 (140 cases, 50.7%). The average surgical time was 69 min (± 39.8). The reduction quality was good in 253 cases (92.0%) and acceptable in 22 cases (8.0%). In 18 cases, a pre-defined primary outcome parameter (6.5%) was recorded after a mean of 8.2 ± 8.0 months. During the observational period, 19 patients (6.9%) required a total of 23 additional surgeries. Implant removal was not considered a failure in the absence of pain. Significant group differences were observed with younger age (p = 0.001), lower Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI)-score (p = 0.041) and lower rate of osteoporosis (p = 0.015) in the failure group. There were no cases of cut-out or cut-through among the patients who underwent augmentation as part of osteosynthesis.

Conclusions: Proximal femur fractures treated with the TFNA show low complication rates and high levels of radiological healing. Implant-related complications might be more common in patients with younger age, a lower CCI-score and lower frequency of osteoporosis. Usage of cement augmentation could potentially be beneficial to reduce postoperative cut-through and cut-out.