Screening and management of portal hypertension in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A French practice survey.

Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol

AP-HP Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service d'Hépato-gastroentérologie, Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Centre de recherche Saint-Antoine (CRSA), Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition (ICAN), F-75012, Paris, France.

Published: February 2023

Background: Portal hypertension (PHT) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are two major complications of cirrhosis that are closely linked and impact patients prognosis, particularly acute variceal bleeding (AVB). Therefore, PHT screening and AVB prophylaxis are major issues to improve the outcome of the patients, but practices may vary among physicians.

Methods: We submitted hepatologists, gastroenterologists and digestive oncologists to a questionnaire of 70 items about PHT screening and management to evaluate their practice.

Results: 95 out of 847 physicians responded to the questionnaire (hepatologists 63.2%, Oncologists/gastroenterologists 36.8%). In patients with advanced HCC, PHT was assessed by endoscopy in 80.0% of cases. HCC progression motivated a new for 12.6% of respondents while no intent to control was declared for 49.5% of them. AVB primary prophylaxis for large size esophageal varices (EV) was impacted by the presence of red marks at endoscopy. In the absence of a red mark, prophylaxis with non-selective betablockers (NSSB) was proposed in 70.5% of cases for patients undergoing TKI and 63.2% undergoing Atezolizumab/Bevacizumab, whereas the combination of endoscopic band ligation (EBL) and NSBB was preferred in 41.1% of patients undergoing TKI versus 53.7% undergoing Atezolizumab/Bevacizumab in case of a red mark. The initiation of a systemic treatment was lower in patients with an history of AVB <6 months, which was even more significant for Atezolizumab/Bevacizumab combination (51.6%) compared to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (72.6%) (p<0.001). Atezolizumab/Bevacizumab was initiated in 43% of participants in case of AVB <6 months versus 95% if >6 months (p<0.001). In case of AVB on Atezolizumab/Bevacizumab, 43.2% continued the treatment after regression of EV, 24.2% continued Atezolizumab alone and 14.7% permanently stopped the treatment.

Conclusion: Strategies for screening and management of PHT in advanced HCC remain very heterogeneous among physicians, suggesting the need to improve PHT knowledge and dedicated studies for advanced HCC.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinre.2022.102059DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

screening management
8
portal hypertension
8
hepatocellular carcinoma
8
pht screening
8
red mark
8
patients undergoing
8
undergoing tki
8
undergoing atezolizumab/bevacizumab
8
patients
6
management portal
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!