Impact of oscillometric measurement artefacts in ambulatory blood pressure monitoring on estimates of average blood pressure and of its variability: a pilot study.

J Hypertens

Institute of Translational Physiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.

Published: January 2023

AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study evaluated how artefacts from oscillometric measurements can affect ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), which is important for diagnosing hypertension.
  • - Four types of artefacts were identified: motor activity, cuff errors, cardiovascular arousals, and arrhythmias, with these artefacts impacting blood pressure readings and potentially leading to incorrect patient classification.
  • - Results showed that artefact-affected measurements resulted in higher average blood pressure values, affecting approximately 23% of participants' hypertension classification and indicating that removing these artefacts can enhance the accuracy of ABPM.

Article Abstract

Objective: Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) plays an important role in the diagnosis of hypertension. However, methodological factors and the measurement conditions affect the results and may lead to incorrect classification of the patient. We performed a pilot study to evaluate the impact of oscillometric measurement artefacts on ABPM-derived variables.

Methods: Four classes of artefacts have been detected: motor activity artefacts, cuff errors, cardiovascular arousals, and arrhythmias. The data consisted of uncorrected measurements (all data), corrected measurements (all artefact free data), and artefact affected data.

Results: A total of 30 individuals (9 female/21 male), aged between 36 and 86 years, mean: 65.5 (standard deviation: 9.5) were included in the study. The average blood pressure (BP) was higher in artefacts-affected measurements compared the artefact-free measurements both for systolic (4.6 mmHg) and diastolic (1.3 mmHg) measurements. Further, artefact-affected systolic BP (SBP) was 6.4 mmHg higher than artefact-free measurements during daytime. Nocturnal measurements showed no artefact-depended differences. Individual comparisons yielded that 23% of the participants crossed the threshold for BP classification for either 24-h, daytime or nocturnal hypertension when comparing uncorrected and artefact-free measurements. Dipping classification changed within 24% of participants. BP variability was 21 and 12% higher for SPB and DBP, respectively, during daytime. These differences were even higher (27% for SBP and 21% for DPB) during night-time.

Conclusion: The study reveals that measurement artefacts are frequently present during cuff-based ABPM and do relevantly affect measurement outcome. Exclusion of measurement artefacts is a promising approach to improving cuff-based ABPM accuracy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000003315DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

measurement artefacts
16
blood pressure
16
artefact-free measurements
12
impact oscillometric
8
oscillometric measurement
8
ambulatory blood
8
pressure monitoring
8
average blood
8
pilot study
8
measurements
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!