Prior anatomy experience among medical students: What difference does it make?

Anat Sci Educ

Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology, and Physiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.

Published: March 2023

Prior research has reported that experience in undergraduate anatomy did not significantly affect students' grades in professional schools, yet students would still recommend anatomy experience prior to medical school. It has been further posited that this prior experience may have benefits that do not appear in grade outcomes, such as decreased stress levels or different study strategies. The present study investigated whether different study strategies in anatomy were reported between students with and without prior experience. The data were collected using surveys administered near the beginning and the end of the medical anatomy course. The surveys included questions about study strategies used for the course, basic demographics, and prior experience in anatomy and/or physiology. Results confirmed very few differences in course outcomes between students with and without prior experience in anatomy and/or physiology; however, differences were noted in the study strategies reported. Students with prior experience in anatomy were more likely to report use of a wider variety of strategies and less changes in strategies between the surveys. However, these differences were only noted with prior courses of a certain number and level. It is posited that students with prior experience may have already created a basic scaffold of information in their mind that they could then plug additional information into rather than creating an entirely new knowledge structure. While this did not largely change course outcomes, it is likely to have positive effects on students' perceptions of stress and feelings of being overwhelmed during the course.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ase.2238DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

prior experience
24
study strategies
16
students prior
16
experience anatomy
12
prior
10
experience
9
anatomy experience
8
reported students
8
anatomy and/or
8
and/or physiology
8

Similar Publications

Background: Educational research highlights active approaches to learning are more effective in knowledge retention and problem-solving. It has long been acknowledged that adapting to more active ways of learning form part of the challenge for new university students as the pedagogical distance between the didactical approach largely followed by secondary school systems the world over differs quite significantly from the often more student-led, critical approach taken by universities. University students encounter various learning challenges, particularly during the transition from secondary school to university.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Experiences of adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus with low socioeconomic status: a qualitative study.

BMC Public Health

January 2025

Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Internal Medicine Nursing, Sakarya University, Sakarya, 54050, Turkey.

Background: Adults with diabetes encounter various challenges related to managing their condition. In this study, we explored the experiences of adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus with low socioeconomic status in Türkiye.

Methods: This study was conducted as a phenomenological qualitative research.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Access to essential healthcare services is pertinent to the achievement of universal health coverage in any nation. The COVID-19 lockdown was used to mitigate the spread of the pandemic. Consequently, there was a reduction in the Utilisation of Basic Healthcare Services (UBHS) in diverse dimensions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

User experience (UX) is a key element in the design of effective public health websites. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Yellow Book, a key travel health resource published by the U.S.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Managing conflicts of interest (COIs) in scientific decision-making is important for minimizing bias and fostering public trust in science. Proper management of COIs has added significance when scientists are making decisions that impact public policy, such as assessing substances for carcinogenicity. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) organizes expert working groups to identify putative carcinogens and determine whether or not the hazard is likely to present significant potential harm to humans.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!