Purpose: The purpose of the study was to investigate the outcome of dual-mobility cup (DM) compared with a standard cup (SC) in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the long-term follow-up based on a regional Italian joint registry (RIPO).

Methods: The Registry of Prosthetic Orthopaedic Implant (RIPO) was consulted, looking for all primary THAs implanted from 2000 to 2019. Three thousand seven hundred ten were dual-mobility cup (DM) total hip arthroplasties (THA) and 85.816 were standard cup (SC) THAs, on a total of 89.526 primary THA. Demographics, survival rates and causes of revision were evaluated and compared between the two groups.

Results: The use of DM progressively increased from 0.4% in 2000 to 7.5% in 2018 of all primary THAs. Revision rate was 3.5% (128 on 3710) for DMC and 4.7% (4061 on 85,816) for SC. DM presented lower dislocation rate if compared to SC with 22-28-mm femoral head diameter. However, DM showed a higher risk of revision for any causes than SC with 32-mm femoral head diameter in long-term follow-up. Nevertheless, no significant difference was measured in terms of demographics and surgical approach for dislocation rate.

Conclusions: The DM cup represents a valid implant solution and has a lower dislocation rate than 22-28-mm SC. A slight increase in the use of DM implants over time was observed in the RIPO. However, a larger population and a longer follow-up are needed to further monitor the survival rate of new-generation DM implants.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9810563PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05639-zDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dual-mobility cup
12
total hip
12
cup primary
8
primary total
8
hip arthroplasties
8
three ten
8
standard cup
8
long-term follow-up
8
primary thas
8
lower dislocation
8

Similar Publications

Background: Obesity has been consistently proven to be associated with an increased risk of dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA). As the prevalence of obesity continues to rise globally, it is of vital importance to minimise risks, including dislocation rates, in these patients undergoing THA.

Methods: We describe a series of patients with obesity, morbid obesity (BMI ≥ 40) and super-obesity (BMI ≥ 50) undergoing THA at our institution over a 10-year period using a dual-mobility acetabular cup.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Dual mobility (DM) total hip replacement (THR) features an acetabular component with an unconstrained tripolar build which ensures a greater range of motion without provoking any dislocation.We report three cases with extremes of surgical misadventure where we carried out a revision arthroplasty with a DM cup. The causes of the failure of the primary arthroplasty were multifactorial, even individually, and ranged from instability due to component malposition, trochanteric fracture, intrapelvic prosthesis protrusion, etc.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Total hip arthroplasty stands as a milestone in surgical success for alleviating hip arthritis-related pain and enhancing patients' quality of life. While complications persist, advancements like dual-mobility articulation aims to mitigate risks. This manuscript presents an unprecedented unique complication in a 60-year-old woman with a revision dual mobility THA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The aim of this study was to show that virtual surgical planning (VSP) and printed anatomical models support the reconstruction of the center of rotation (COR) and pelvic BRIM during revision hip surgery using a dual-mobility revision cup system in patients with anterior pelvic column damage and soft tissue envelope deficiency. Patients with anterior pelvic column damage and soft tissue envelope deficiency underwent revision hip arthroplasty. Virtual planning included assessment of bone segmentation, positioning of the cementless revision cup while maintaining the COR, and the assumed inclination and anteversion angles.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: The dual mobility cup (DMC) reduces the dislocation rates in total hip arthroplasty (THA). DMC systems include anatomical (non-modular or monoblock) (ADM) and modular dual mobility (MDM) components (Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ, USA). This review aims to assess differences between these two types of DMC implants concerning dislocation and revision rates, as well as patient-reported outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!