Unlabelled: Previous systematic reviews evaluating piezoelectric osteotomy are of critically low quality. We conducted a high-quality systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate outcomes for piezoelectric versus conventional osteotomy.
Methods: The study protocol was published a priori (PROSPERO: CRD42021287877). MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL were searched for studies comparing piezoelectric versus conventional osteotomes and reporting at least one outcome of interest (clinical or patient-reported outcomes, PROs). Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using GRADE and Cochrane's RoB-2/ROBINS-I tools, respectively. Random effects models were applied.
Results: Of 347 articles, 10 studies (nine randomized controlled trials; one prospective cohort study) including 554 patients were included. Piezoelectric osteotomy was associated with significantly reduced edema [standardized mean difference (SMD), -0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI), -1.03 to -0.30; < 0.0004], ecchymosis (SMD, -0.93; 95% CI, -1.13 to -0.73; < 0.00001), and pain (SMD, -1.48; 95% CI, -2.07 to -0.88; < 0.00001) compared with standard osteotomy. Odds of mucosal injury were significantly lower following piezoelectric osteotomy (odds ratio, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.52; = 0.01). There was no difference in duration of osteotomy (SMD, 3.15; 95% CI, -1.82 to 8.12; = 0.22) or total procedure duration (SMD, 0.46; 95% CI, -0.43 to 1.36; = 0.31). One study reported PROs, favoring piezoelectric osteotomy.
Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis provides support (albeit weak, due to low-quality evidence) for piezoelectric over conventional osteotomy, for reducing morbidity in the early postoperative period. High-quality level I data reporting PROs will optimize shared decision-making/informed consent.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9699654 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004673 | DOI Listing |
Aesthet Surg J
January 2025
Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Background: Preservation rhinoplasty, particularly dorsal preservation, has gained prominence with the advent of piezoelectric instruments, which minimize trauma and enhance precision in bone reshaping. This approach presents unique challenges, especially in closed techniques, where spatial limitations complicate the use of piezotomes.
Objectives: To evaluate outcomes of piezo-assisted preservation rhinoplasty using specialized instrumentation to enhance visibility, precision, and postoperative recovery in closed rhinoplasty procedures.
J Craniofac Surg
December 2024
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina.
Clin Oral Investig
December 2024
Oral Surgery and Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Int J Surg Case Rep
January 2025
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria.
Introduction And Importance: Placing dental implants in a narrow mandibular alveolar ridge poses a range of significant challenges. The objective of this paper is to demonstrate the combined application of piezoelectric surgery and magnetic mallet for alveolar ridge splitting and bone expansion in dental implant procedures. It aims to highlight the potential benefits of integrating these technologies in mandibular implant sites.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Biomech (Bristol)
December 2024
Western University, 1151 Richmond St, London, Ontario N6A 3K7, Canada; Toronto Metropolitan University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, Ontario M5B 2K3, Canada. Electronic address:
Background: Piezoelectric osteotomy represents a potentially viable alternative to conventional techniques for preparing pilot holes for bone screws. However, piezoelectric osteotomes have demonstrated the potential to heat bone beyond 47 °C, which induces necrosis that could contribute to screw loosening, resulting in osteosynthetic material failure and pseudarthrosis. Thus, we sought to determine the working movements of a piezoelectric drill that resulted in the lowest maximum bone temperatures while ensuring that this optimal drilling motion resulted in temperatures below 47 °C.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!