External validation of the Glasgow coma scale-pupils in low- to middle-income country patients with traumatic brain injury: Could "motor score-pupil" have higher prognostic value?

Background: The objective of this study is to validate the admission Glasgow coma scale (GCS) associated with pupil response (GCS-P) to predict traumatic brain injury (TBI) patient's outcomes in a low- to middle-income country and to compare its performance with that of a simplified model combining the better motor response of the GCS and the pupilar response (MS-P).

Methods: This is a prospective cohort of patients with TBI in a tertiary trauma reference center in Brazil. Predictive values of the GCS, GCS-P, and MS-P were evaluated and compared for 14 day and in-hospital mortality outcomes and length of hospital stay (LHS).

Results: The study enrolled 447 patients. MS-P demonstrated better discriminative ability than GCS to predict mortality (AUC 0.736 × 0.658; < 0.001) and higher AUC than GCS-P (0.736 × 0.704, respectively; = 0.073). For hospital mortality, MS-P demonstrated better discrimination than GCS (AUC, 0.750 × 0.682; < 0.001) and higher AUC than GCS-P (0.750 × 0.714; = 0.027). Both scores were good predictors of LHS (r = 0.084 [GCS-P] × 0.079 [GCS] × 0.072 [MS-P]).

Conclusion: The predictive value of the GCS, GCS-P, and MS-P scales was demonstrated, thus contributing to its external validation in low- to middle-income country.