Two versions of the flash grab illusion were used to examine the relative contributions of motion before and motion after the test flash to the illusory position shift. The stimulus in the first two experiments was a square pattern that expanded and contracted with an outline square flashed each time the motion reversed producing a dramatic difference in perceived size between the two reversals. Experiment 1 showed a strong illusion when motion was present before and after the flashed tests or just after the flashes, but no significant effect when only the pre-flash motion was present. In Experiment 2, motion always followed the flash, and the duration of the pre-flash motion was varied. The results showed a significant increase in illusion strength with the duration of pre-flash motion and the effect of the pre-flash motion was almost 50% that of the post-flash motion. Finally, Experiment 3 tested the position shifts when the linear motion of a disk before the flash was orthogonal to its motion after the flash. Here, the results again showed that the pre-flash motion made a significant contribution, about 32% that of the post-flash motion. Several models are considered and even though all fail to some degree, they do offer insights into the nature of the illusion. Finally, we show that the empirical measure of the relative contribution of motion before and after the flash can be used to distinguish the mechanisms underlying different illusions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9716231PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.12.19DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pre-flash motion
20
motion
16
motion flash
12
position shift
8
motion test
8
duration pre-flash
8
post-flash motion
8
flash
6
pre-flash
5
motion-induced position
4

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • Visual illusions are systematic misperceptions that reveal how our brains construct visual experiences, with the "frame effect" being a notable example where moving frames mislead our perception of an object's position.
  • A newly identified illusion, the "split stimulus effect," shows that symmetrical motion of overlaid frames can cause observers to perceive two instances of a single stimulus, as evidenced by participants sometimes reporting two dots when only one was shown.
  • This study also explored factors influencing the illusion, such as frame speed and spatial attention, and demonstrated that individuals can hold conflicting perceptual predictions about the same object, shedding light on the underlying mechanisms of visual perception.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Two versions of the flash grab illusion were used to examine the relative contributions of motion before and motion after the test flash to the illusory position shift. The stimulus in the first two experiments was a square pattern that expanded and contracted with an outline square flashed each time the motion reversed producing a dramatic difference in perceived size between the two reversals. Experiment 1 showed a strong illusion when motion was present before and after the flashed tests or just after the flashes, but no significant effect when only the pre-flash motion was present.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!