Detection of Post-COVID-19 Lung Abnormalities: Photon-counting CT versus Same-Day Energy-integrating Detector CT.

Radiology

From the Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy (F.P., P.K., A.S., P.T.M., D.K., S.R., L.B., M.L.W., R.I.M., C.W., C.J.H., H.P., B.H.H.), Department of Medicine II, Division of Pulmonology (D.B., C.M., D.G.), and Department of Medicine II, Division of Cardiology (M.G.), Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria; and Department of Radiology, UMass Memorial Medical Center and University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, Mass (D.K.).

Published: April 2023

Background Photon-counting detector (PCD) CT enables ultra-high-resolution lung imaging and may shed light on morphologic correlates of persistent symptoms after COVID-19. Purpose To compare PCD CT with energy-integrating detector (EID) CT for noninvasive assessment of post-COVID-19 lung abnormalities. Materials and Methods For this prospective study, adult participants with one or more COVID-19-related persisting symptoms (resting or exertional dyspnea, cough, fatigue) underwent same-day EID and PCD CT between April 2022 and June 2022. The 1.0-mm EID CT images and, subsequently, 1.0-, 0.4-, and 0.2-mm PCD CT images were reviewed for the presence of lung abnormalities. Subjective and objective EID and PCD CT image quality were evaluated using a five-point Likert scale (-2 to 2) and lung signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). Results Twenty participants (mean age, 54 years ± 16 [SD]; 10 men) were included. EID CT showed post-COVID-19 lung abnormalities in 15 of 20 (75%) participants, with a median involvement of 10% of lung volume [IQR, 0%-45%] and 3.5 lobes [IQR, 0-5]. Ground-glass opacities and linear bands (10 of 20 participants [50%] for both) were the most frequent findings at EID CT. PCD CT revealed additional lung abnormalities in 10 of 20 (50%) participants, with the most common being bronchiectasis (10 of 20 [50%]). Subjective image quality was improved for 1.0-mm PCD versus 1.0-mm EID CT images (median, 1; IQR, 1-2; < .001) and 0.4-mm versus 1.0-mm PCD CT images (median, 1; IQR, 1-1; < .001) but not for 0.4-mm versus 0.2-mm PCD CT images (median, 0; IQR, 0-0.5; = .26). PCD CT delivered higher lung SNR versus EID CT for 1.0-mm images (mean difference, 0.53 ± 0.96; = .03) but lower SNR for 0.4-mm versus 1.0-mm images and 0.2-mm vs 0.4-mm images (-1.52 ± 0.68 [ < .001] and -1.15 ± 0.43 [ < .001], respectively). Conclusion Photon-counting detector CT outperformed energy-integrating detector CT in the visualization of subtle post-COVID-19 lung abnormalities and image quality. © RSNA, 2023

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9718279PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.222087DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lung abnormalities
24
post-covid-19 lung
16
energy-integrating detector
12
eid pcd
12
pcd images
12
image quality
12
versus 10-mm
12
images median
12
median iqr
12
04-mm versus
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!