Inequalities in Access to Mental Health Treatment by Australian Youths During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Psychiatr Serv

Centre for Youth Mental Health (Gao, Menssink, Filia, Rice, McGorry, Cotton) and Melbourne School of Population and Global Health (McDonald, Simons), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Orygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (Gao, Hamilton, Menssink, Filia, Rice, McGorry, Cotton); headspace National Youth Mental Health Foundation, Melbourne (Rickwood); Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia (Rickwood); Brain and Mind, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia (Hickie).

Published: June 2023

Objective: The authors aimed to evaluate changes in use of government-subsidized primary mental health services, through the Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS), by young people during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia and whether changes were associated with age, sex, socioeconomic status, and residence in particular geographical areas.

Methods: Interrupted time-series analyses were conducted by using quarterly mental health MBS service data (all young people ages 12-25 years, 2015-2020) for individual Statistical Area Level 3 areas across Australia. The data captured >22.4 million service records. Meta-analysis and meta-regression models estimated the pandemic interruption effect at the national level and delineated factors influencing these estimates.

Results: Compared with expected prepandemic trends, a 6.2% (95% CI=5.3%-7.2%) increase was noted for all young people in use of MBS mental health services in 2020. Substantial differences were found between age and sex subgroups, with a higher increase among females and young people ages 18-25. A decreasing trend was observed for males ages 18-25 (3.5% reduction, 95% CI=2.5%-4.5%). The interruption effect was strongly associated with socioeconomic status. Service uptake increased in areas of high socioeconomic status, with smaller or limited uptake in areas of low socioeconomic status.

Conclusions: During 2020, young people's use of primary mental health services increased overall. However, increases were inequitably distributed and relatively low, compared with increases in population-level mental health burden. Policy makers should address barriers to primary care access for young people, particularly for young males and those from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20220345DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mental health
24
young people
20
health services
12
socioeconomic status
12
covid-19 pandemic
8
primary mental
8
age sex
8
people ages
8
ages 18-25
8
young
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!