AI Article Synopsis

  • The study assessed the progression of COVID-19 treatment standards (SOC) and their impact on patient recovery and mortality rates during 2020-2021, using data from the Adaptive COVID-19 Treatment Trial (ACTT).
  • Results indicated that outcomes improved significantly from ACTT-2 to ACTT-3, with notable reductions in mortality and intubation rates, although the improvements from ACTT-1 to ACTT-2 were less pronounced.
  • The analysis also explored various factors that could explain these trends, including changes in SOC, surges in COVID-19 cases, and the emergence of different virus variants, highlighting an increase in the use of dexamethasone in later trials.

Article Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 standard of care (SOC) evolved rapidly during 2020 and 2021, but its cumulative effect over time is unclear.

Objective: To evaluate whether recovery and mortality improved as SOC evolved, using data from ACTT (Adaptive COVID-19 Treatment Trial).

Design: ACTT is a series of phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials that evaluated COVID-19 therapeutics from February 2020 through May 2021. ACTT-1 compared remdesivir plus SOC to placebo plus SOC, and in ACTT-2 and ACTT-3, remdesivir plus SOC was the control group. This post hoc analysis compared recovery and mortality between these comparable sequential cohorts of patients who received remdesivir plus SOC, adjusting for baseline characteristics with propensity score weighting. The analysis was repeated for participants in ACTT-3 and ACTT-4 who received remdesivir plus dexamethasone plus SOC. Trends in SOC that could explain outcome improvements were analyzed. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04280705 [ACTT-1], NCT04401579 [ACTT-2], NCT04492475 [ACTT-3], and NCT04640168 [ACTT-4]).

Setting: 94 hospitals in 10 countries (86% U.S. participants).

Participants: Adults hospitalized with COVID-19.

Intervention: SOC.

Measurements: 28-day mortality and recovery.

Results: Although outcomes were better in ACTT-2 than in ACTT-1, adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were close to 1 (HR for recovery, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.92 to 1.17]; HR for mortality, 0.90 [CI, 0.56 to 1.40]). Comparable patients were less likely to be intubated in ACTT-2 than in ACTT-1 (odds ratio, 0.75 [CI, 0.53 to 0.97]), and hydroxychloroquine use decreased. Outcomes improved from ACTT-2 to ACTT-3 (HR for recovery, 1.43 [CI, 1.24 to 1.64]; HR for mortality, 0.45 [CI, 0.21 to 0.97]). Potential explanatory factors (SOC trends, case surges, and variant trends) were similar between ACTT-2 and ACTT-3, except for increased dexamethasone use (11% to 77%). Outcomes were similar in ACTT-3 and ACTT-4. Antibiotic use decreased gradually across all stages.

Limitation: Unmeasured confounding.

Conclusion: Changes in patient composition explained improved outcomes from ACTT-1 to ACTT-2 but not from ACTT-2 to ACTT-3, suggesting improved SOC. These results support excluding nonconcurrent controls from analysis of platform trials in rapidly changing therapeutic areas.

Primary Funding Source: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9709721PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/M22-2116DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

actt-2 actt-3
16
remdesivir soc
12
soc
10
post hoc
8
adaptive covid-19
8
covid-19 treatment
8
soc evolved
8
2020 2021
8
recovery mortality
8
improved soc
8

Similar Publications

Immunomodulators for immunocompromised patients hospitalized for COVID-19: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

EClinicalMedicine

March 2024

Département de Rhumatologie, Hôpital Bicêtre, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Saclay, INSERM UMR 1184, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France.

Article Synopsis
  • Immunomodulators, which are used to treat COVID-19, do not appear to improve outcomes for immunocompromised patients without increasing risks of secondary infections.
  • A review of eleven randomized controlled trials with 397 patients showed no significant differences in mortality or infection rates between those treated with immunomodulators and those receiving standard care.
  • The findings suggest that immunomodulators provide no clear benefit or harm for immunocompromised patients hospitalized due to COVID-19, according to the study conducted.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

To protect people from severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, tremendous research efforts have been made toward coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) treatment development. Externally controlled trials (ECTs) may help reduce their development time. To evaluate whether ECT using real-world data (RWD) of patients with COVID-19 is feasible enough to be used for regulatory decision making, we built an external control arm (ECA) based on RWD as a control arm of a previously conducted randomized controlled trial (RCT), and compared it to the control arm of the RCT.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study assessed the progression of COVID-19 treatment standards (SOC) and their impact on patient recovery and mortality rates during 2020-2021, using data from the Adaptive COVID-19 Treatment Trial (ACTT).
  • Results indicated that outcomes improved significantly from ACTT-2 to ACTT-3, with notable reductions in mortality and intubation rates, although the improvements from ACTT-1 to ACTT-2 were less pronounced.
  • The analysis also explored various factors that could explain these trends, including changes in SOC, surges in COVID-19 cases, and the emergence of different virus variants, highlighting an increase in the use of dexamethasone in later trials.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!