Does Diagnostic Laparoscopy Still Have a Role in the Evaluation of Right Iliac Fossa Pain Versus Imaging Techniques or Experience?

Background Right iliac fossa (RIF) pain is the most common cause of emergency surgical presentation, and a significant number of patients are eventually diagnosed with acute appendicitis. Typically, appendicitis is a clinical diagnosis, and it is prudent to take the patient to theatre for an early diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) to prevent complications as a result of acute appendicitis with the caveat it may lead to an increased number of negative appendectomies. The primary objective of this study was to ascertain the efficacy of DL in tackling RIF pain. The secondary objective was to compare the results among the diagnostic versus imaging groups (negative appendectomy rate, postoperative complications, and length of stay). Methodology The data were collected retrospectively for patients presenting with RIF pain in the surgical unit of the Royal Oldham Hospital between April 2017 and March 2019. The electronic database was utilized to identify all patients who underwent appendicectomy during this period. Patients were divided into two groups, group one had DL as their primary operation, and group two had imaging prior to surgery. Group two was further subdivided into computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (USG). Data included blood results, imaging reports, intraoperative findings, length of stay (LOS), postoperative complications, and histopathology results. The data were analysed using an Excel sheet and SPSS version 27 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results A total of 340 patients were identified. Group one had 165 (48.53%) and group two had 175 (51.47%) patients. Most surgeries were carried out by middle-grade doctors (80.95%). Comparison with the histopathology report revealed that the negative appendectomy rate was 20% in group one, 3.8% in the CT group, and 27.5% in the USG group. The average length of stay was 2 ± 1.38 days in the diagnostic group and 3 ± 2.7 and 3 ± 0.8 days in subsequent groups. Conclusions This study shows that DL is a valuable first option when trained surgeons are available for tackling RIF pain, particularly in the young age group where it can reduce the risk of radiation exposure, decrease LOS, and avoid complications because of perforation.