On-field low-frequency fatigue measurement after repeated drop jumps.

Front Physiol

Laboratoire Interuniversitaire de Biologie de la Motricité, UJM Saint-Etienne, University Lyon, SAINT-ETIENNE, France.

Published: November 2022

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to validate a portable device for measuring low-frequency fatigue (LFF) in athletes outside of the lab, which can help monitor performance and injury risk.
  • Changes in muscle strength and fatigue levels, measured before and after drop jumps, showed a significant decrease in both the maximal voluntary contraction and Powerdex values, indicating effective LFF assessment.
  • The device demonstrated a strong correlation with traditional lab measurements, making it a useful tool for athletes and coaches to track muscle fatigue in real-time.

Article Abstract

Monitoring fatigue is now commonly performed in athletes as it can directly impact performance and may further increase the risk of injury or overtraining syndrome. Among the exercise-induced peripheral alterations, low-frequency fatigue (LFF) assessment is commonly restricted to in-lab studies. Measuring LFF on-field would allow athletes and coaches to assess muscle fatigability on a regular basis. The aim of the present study was therefore to validate a new portable device allowing quadriceps LFF assessment in the field. LFF was assessed in 15 active and healthy participants before (PRE) and after (POST) a series of drop jumps. LFF was assessed, thanks to a dedicated device recording evoked force to muscle submaximal electrical low- and high-frequency stimulation. Changes in the low- to high-frequency force ratio (further referred to as Powerdex value) were compared to the changes in the ratio of evoked force induced by paired-pulse femoral nerve electrical stimulation at 10 and 100 Hz (i.e., DB10/DB100 ratio). Maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) and voluntary activation (VA) were also measured. MVC decreased ( < 0.001), whereas VA was not affected by the fatiguing task ( = 0.14). There was a decrease in the DB10/DB100 ratio (from 96.4% to 67.3%, < 0.001) as well as in the Powerdex value (from 74.0% to 55.7%, < 0.001). There was no significant difference between POST values (expressed in percentage of PRE values) of the DB10/DB100 ratio and Powerdex ( = 0.44), and there was a significant correlation between the changes in Powerdex and DB10/DB100 (r = 0.82, < 0.001). The on-field device we tested is a valid tool to assess LFF after a strenuous exercise consisting of repeated drop jumps as it evidences the presence of LFF similarly to a lab technique. Such a device can be used to monitor muscle fatigability related to excitation-contraction in athletes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9681803PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.1039616DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

drop jumps
12
db10/db100 ratio
12
low-frequency fatigue
8
repeated drop
8
lff assessment
8
muscle fatigability
8
lff assessed
8
evoked force
8
low- high-frequency
8
lff
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!