A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Sonophotocatalytic degradation of malachite green in aqueous solution using six competitive metal oxides as a benchmark. | LitMetric

A comparison study examines six different metal oxides (CuO, ZnO, FeO, CoO, NiO, and α-MnO) for the degradation of malachite green dye using four distinct processes. These processes are as follows: sonocatalysis (US/metal oxide), sonocatalysis under ultra-violet irradiation (US/metal oxide/UV), sonocatalysis in the presence of hydrogen peroxide (US/metal oxide/HO), and a combination of all these processes (US/metal oxide/UV/HO). The effective operating parameters, such as the dosage of metal oxide nanoparticles (MONPs), the type of the process, and the metal oxides' efficiency order, were studied. At the same reaction conditions, the sonophotocatalytic is the best process for all six MOsNPs, CuO was the better metal oxide than other MOsNPs, and at the sonocatalysis process, ZnO was the best metal oxide in other processes. It was found that the metal oxide order for sonocatalytic process is CuO > α-MnO ≥ ZnO > NiO ≥ FeO ≥ CoO within 15-45 min. The order of (US/metal oxide/UV) process is ZnO ≥ NiO ≥ α-MnO > FeO ≥ CuO CoO within 5-40 min. The order of (US/ MOsNPs/ HO) process is ZnO ≥ CuO ≥ α-MnO ≥ NiO > CoO > FeO within 5-20 min. The maximum removal efficiency order of the sonophotocatalytic process is ZnO ≥ CuO > α-MnO > NiO > FeO ≥ CoO within 2-8 min. The four processes degradation efficiency was in the order US/MOsNPs ˂ US/MOsNPs/UV ˂ US/MOsNPs/HO ˂ (UV/Ultrasonic/MOsNPs/HO). Complete degradation of MG was obtained at 0.05 g/L MONPs and 1 mM of HO using 296 W/L ultrasonic power and 15 W ultra-violet lamp (UV-C) within a reaction time of 8 min according to the MOsNPs type at the same sonophotocatalytic/HO reaction conditions. The US/metal oxide/UV/HO process is inexpensive, highly reusable, and efficient for degrading dyes in colored wastewater.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43630-022-00336-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

metal oxide
16
efficiency order
12
degradation malachite
8
malachite green
8
metal oxides
8
us/metal oxide/uv
8
us/metal oxide/uv/ho
8
process
8
reaction conditions
8
metal
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!