A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

What Are the Factors Associated with the Structural Damage Differences in Open-Angle Glaucoma? RNFL- and GCIPL-Dominant Progression. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • * Results showed that higher pre-treatment intraocular pressure (IOP), younger age, and greater lamina cribrosa curvature index (LCCI) were more associated with RNFL-dominant progression compared to GCIPL-dominant progression.
  • * The findings suggest that different treatment goals and strategies might be necessary for patients with RNFL- versus GCIPL-dominant progression based on their specific factors like IOP and age.

Article Abstract

We sought to analyze the parameters associated with retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL)-dominant progression or ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL)-dominant progression in patients with open-angle glaucoma. A prospective observational study was conducted. Overall, 58 eyes from 33 patients with open-angle glaucoma were categorized into the following two groups: patients with RNFL- and GCIPL-dominant progression, and the primary outcome was the difference in associated factors between two groups. Higher pre-treatment and mean IOP, greater lamina cribrosa curvature index (LCCI), and younger age were more significantly associated with the RNFL-dominant progression group than the GCIPL-dominant progression group. When adjusting for mean IOP, age, LCCI, and microvascular dropout (MVD), only pre-treatment IOP was significantly associated with the RNFL-dominant progression group. However, when adjusting for pre-treatment IOP, age, LCCI, and MVD, both higher mean IOP and greater LCCI were significantly associated with RNFL-dominant progression. In conclusion, pre-treatment and mean IOP and LCCI were more strongly associated with the RNFL-dominant progression group than the GCIPL-dominant progression group. In contrast, age, peripapillary choroidal microvascular dropout, and systolic and diastolic blood pressures tended to damage the GCIPL predominantly rather than the RNFL. Therefore, our findings suggest the potential to set different treatment targets and identify various treatment methods for each group.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9695001PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11226728DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

gcipl-dominant progression
20
rnfl-dominant progression
20
progression group
20
pre-treatment iop
16
associated rnfl-dominant
16
progression
10
rnfl- gcipl-dominant
8
patients open-angle
8
open-angle glaucoma
8
iop greater
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!