A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Development of the Korean Medicine Core Outcome Set for Primary Dysmenorrhea (COS-PD-KM) for Herbal Medicine Treatment of Primary Dysmenorrhea in Primary Clinics. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to create a core outcome set (COS) for evaluating the effectiveness of herbal medicine in treating primary dysmenorrhea in patients at Korean medicine clinics.
  • A literature review identified initial outcomes and effect modifiers, followed by a series of modified Delphi consensus exercises involving experts and primary care clinicians to refine these outcomes.
  • The final COS included 10 outcomes and 6 effect modifiers, confirming that the developed COS can effectively assess herbal medicine's impact on primary dysmenorrhea treatment, with suggestions for future research involving more stakeholders.

Article Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop a Korean medicine (KM) core outcome set (COS) for primary dysmenorrhea to evaluate the effectiveness of herbal medicine (HM) in treating primary dysmenorrhea in patients visiting KM primary clinics. Previously reported outcomes were identified through a literature review to define outcomes and effect modifiers (EMs) for the questionnaire. Experts were invited to conduct modified Delphi consensus exercises, and primary care clinicians were invited to conduct Delphi consensus exercises to evaluate suitability and feasibility. Finally, an additional round of a modified Delphi exercise was conducted with experts to obtain a final agreement on the COS. Seventeen outcomes and 15 EMs were included from a literature review, and one effect modifier was suggested by the experts (Phase 1). In Phase 2, after the modified Delphi consensus exercises by experts, 10 outcomes and 11 EMs were included in the COS. The clinicians all agreed on the feasibility of COS (Phase 3). Finally, 10 outcomes and 6 EMs were included in the COS-PD-KM after the final modified Delphi consensus exercise (Phase 4). The effectiveness of HM used in primary clinics could be evaluated with this COS in patients with primary dysmenorrhea. Further studies that involve more relevant stakeholder groups, such as patient representatives and gynecological experts, are needed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9690837PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192215321DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

primary dysmenorrhea
20
modified delphi
16
delphi consensus
16
primary clinics
12
consensus exercises
12
outcomes ems
12
ems included
12
primary
9
korean medicine
8
medicine core
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!