Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Cag A-positive isolated from human gastric mucosa is categorized as a Western or East Asian allele-type based on whether the gene encodes an EPIYA-C or EPIYA-D motif. We aimed to differentiate between the 2 types of by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) gastric biopsy samples.
Materials And Methods: We developed 2 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that detect either the EPIYA-C or EPIYA-D motif of the CagA protein by IHC using FFPE tissues. FFPE tissue sections from 30 Japanese and 39 Brazilian gastric biopsy samples with infection confirmed by Giemsa staining (moderate/severe in the Sydney classification system) were examined by IHC with the novel mAbs followed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for EPIYA-C or EPIYA-D using DNA extracted from adjacent tissue sections.
Results: Differentiation among Western and East Asian types and CagA-negative was successful in most (97%) samples by IHC with the novel mAbs and commercially available mAbs that react with a species-specific lipopolysaccharide or a common CagA motif of . The detection status of EPIYA-C/D motifs by IHC with the novel mAbs was consistent with the PCR results in 61 (88%) of 69 samples: EPIYA-C(+)/D(-) in zero Japanese and 26 Brazilian samples, EPIYA-C(-)/D(+) in 26 Japanese and 1 Brazilian sample, and EPIYA-C(-)/D(-) in 1 Japanese and 7 Brazilian samples. The detection sensitivity and specificity of IHC with each novel mAb compared with the PCR results were, respectively, 84% and 97% for EPIYA-C, and 97% and 95% for EPIYA-D.
Conclusions: The novel mAbs specific to each EPIYA-C or EPIYA-D motif differentiated between Western and East Asian types of CagA-positive by IHC using FFPE tissues. Applying these novel mAbs to large numbers of archived pathology samples will contribute to elucidating the association of these allele types with gastric cancer.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9678484 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1371089 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!