Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Increasing the accuracy and reproducibility of subcortical brain segmentation is advantageous in various related clinical applications. In this study, we derived a segmentation method based on a convolutional neural network (i.e., U-Net) and a large-scale database consisting of 7039 brain T1-weighted MRI data samples. We evaluated the method by using experiments focused on three distinct topics, namely, the necessity of preprocessing steps, cross-institutional and longitudinal reproducibility, and volumetric accuracy. The optimized model, MX_RW-where "MX" is a mix of RW and nonuniform intensity normalization data and "RW" is raw data with basic preprocessing-did not require time-consuming preprocessing steps, such as nonuniform intensity normalization or image registration, for brain MRI before segmentation. Cross-institutional testing revealed that MX_RW (Dice similarity coefficient: 0.809, coefficient of variation: 4.6%, and Pearson's correlation coefficient: 0.979) exhibited a performance comparable with that of FreeSurfer (Dice similarity coefficient: 0.798, coefficient of variation: 5.6%, and Pearson's correlation coefficient: 0.973). The computation time per dataset of MX_RW was generally less than 5 s (even when tested without graphics processing units), which was notably faster than FreeSurfer. Thus, for time-restricted applications, MX_RW represents a competitive alternative to FreeSurfer.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nbm.4880 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!