Background: A challenge of C2 pedicle screw placement is to avoid penetration into the C1-C2 facet joint, as this may alter normal biomechanics and accelerate joint degeneration. Our objective was to clarify how local anatomy and surgical technique may relate to C2 pedicle screw penetration into the C1-C2 facet joint.

Methods: C2 pedicle screws were inserted using a fluoroscopically assisted freehand technique. Independent fellowship-trained spine surgeons blindly reviewed intraoperative fluoroscopic and postoperative computed tomography (CT) images for evidence of facet joint penetration (FJP). C2 pedicle morphometry, the sagittal angle of the facet joint, axial and sagittal pedicle screw angles, and screw length were measured on the relevant CT images.

Results: A total of 34 patients fulfilled the study criteria, and a total of 68 C2 pedicle screws were placed. Eight screws (16%) penetrated the C1-C2 facet joint. The mean sagittal angle of the C1-C2 facet joint was significantly lower in the FJP group compared with the non-FJP group. The mean sagittal angle of the screws was significantly higher in the FJP group compared with the non-FJP group. The mean screw length was significantly greater for screws causing FJP compared with the non-FJP group. The mean axial screw angle was significantly lower in the FJP group compared with the non-FJP group. Pedicle width, length, height, and transverse angle were not significantly associated with FJP. Independent reviewers were able to identify FJP on intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging in 2 out of 8 cases.

Conclusion: Lower sagittal angle of the facet joint, higher sagittal angle of the pedicle screw, and screw length >24 mm are associated with higher risk of C1-C2 FJP. When placing C2 pedicle screws under these conditions, caution should be taken to avoid FJP.

Clinical Relevance: Several anatomical and technical factors may increase the risk of C1-C2 FJP during placement of C2 pedicle screws using a fluoroscopically assisted freehand technique, underscoring the importance of preoperative planning and limiting screw length.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10025835PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.14444/8386DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

facet joint
28
c1-c2 facet
20
pedicle screws
20
screw length
20
sagittal angle
20
pedicle screw
16
compared non-fjp
16
non-fjp group
16
fjp group
12
group compared
12

Similar Publications

Lumbar facet joints are the source of pain in 15%-41% of individuals experiencing low back pain (LBP). Conventional lumbar facet radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has Level II evidence for improving pain and function. The best proven technique, the parallel technique, is technically challenging, time-consuming, and often uncomfortable for the patient.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The trend of an annual increase in the detection of new cases of osteoarthritis (OA) and an increase in the number of patients with chronic lower back pain (LBP) calls for the search for new drugs and pharmaconutraceuticals with anti-inflammatory and chondroprotective properties. In 2019, approaches to the treatment of pain in OA significantly changed. In international and Russian clinical guidelines (CG), pharmaconutraceutical chondroitin sulfate (CS) and glucosamine sulfate (GS) are recommended for OA of different localization as a basic therapy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To compare the safety and effectiveness in improving function and reducing pain of autologous PRP to corticosteroid (CS) zygapophyseal (Z-joint) intra-articular (IA) injections at six months for patients with chronic osteoarthritis Z-joint mediated low back pain (LBP).

Design: Prospective triple-blinded multicentric randomized controlled trial.

Methods: Fifty participants with radiological signs of Z-joint OA and chronic Z-joint mediated LBP confirmed by a ≥80 % pain improvement after two IA local anesthetic injections were randomized into PRP and CS groups, using a 1:1 ratio.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Treatment Effectiveness of Volar Plates in Distal Radius Dorsal Rim Fractures.

Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)

December 2024

Departamento de Ortopedia, Traumatologia e Cirurgia da Mão, Faculdade de Medicina, Ankara University, Altındağ, Ankara, Turquia.

 To assess the efficacy of distal radius volar plates in cases involving dorsal fragments at the Ulnar Corner (UC) and Lister Tubercle (LT).  A retrospective study that included patients with distal radius fractures (DRFs) featuring UC and LT dorsal fragments treated with volar plates. The exclusion criteria comprised lunate facet fractures, UC fragment ratio below 25%, and patients treated with dorsal plates.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!