We assessed the diagnostic performance of the Biofire® Filmarray® Pneumonia Plus panel (FA-PP) compared to standard culture in Intensive Care Unit patients with suspected ventilator-associated lower respiratory tract infection in the COVID-19 era. We determined whether its implementation in routine diagnostic algorithms would be cost-beneficial from a hospital perspective. Of 163 specimens, 96 (59%) returned negative results with FA-PP and conventional culture, and 29 specimens (17.8%) were positive with both diagnostic methods and yielded concordant qualitative bacterial identification/isolation. Thirty-nine specimens (23.9%) gave discordant results (positive via FA-PP and negative via culture). Real-life adjustments of empirical antimicrobial therapy (EAT) after FA-PP results resulted in additional costs beyond EAT alone of 1868.7 €. Adequate EAT adjustments upon FA-PP results would have resulted in a saving of 6675.8 €. In conclusion, the data presented supports the potential utility of FA-PP for early EAT adjustment in patients with ventilator-associated lower respiratory tract infection.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9625846PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115847DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lower respiratory
12
respiratory tract
12
tract infection
12
biofire® filmarray®
8
filmarray® pneumonia
8
pneumonia panel
8
covid-19 era
8
ventilator-associated lower
8
fa-pp
6
panel management
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!