A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The effect of HydroSpacer implant placement on the wear of opposing and adjacent cartilage. | LitMetric

The effect of HydroSpacer implant placement on the wear of opposing and adjacent cartilage.

J Orthop Res

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Orthopaedic Biomechanics, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

Published: July 2023

A HydroSpacer implant, that is, a swelling hydrogel confined by a spacer fabric, was developed to repair focal cartilage defects and to prevent progression into osteoarthritis. The present study evaluated the effect of implant placement height in an osteochondral (OC) plug on wear of the opposing and adjacent cartilage. Three-dimensional warp-knitted spacer fabrics, polycaprolactone with poly(4-hydroxybutyrate) pile yarns, were filled with a hyaluronic acid methacrylate and chondroitin sulfate methacrylate hydrogel. After polymerization of the hydrogel, these HydroSpacers were implanted in OC defects (ø 6 mm) created in bovine OC plugs (ø 10 mm) and allowed to swell to equilibrium. A custom-made pin-on-plate wear apparatus was used to apply simultaneous compression and sliding against bovine cartilage. Cartilage damage, visualized with Indian ink, was only seen for the group in which the HydroSpacer was placed flush with the surrounding cartilage. A significant increase on average surface roughness of the sliding path compared to the adjacent cartilage confirmed surface damage for this group. When the implants were recessed (with and without extra hydrogel layer on top of the implant), this damage was not observed, but the cartilage surrounding the implants was compressed (without damage) indicating substantial load sharing with the implant. Furthermore, it was shown that all defects treated with a HydroSpacer implant resulted in shear forces comparable to intact cartilage. Clinical significance: The present study suggests that placing a HydroSpacer implant recessed into the surrounding cartilage would decrease wear of the opposing cartilage. Altogether, this study supports the development of textile-constraining hydrogels for cartilage replacement.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jor.25487DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hydrospacer implant
16
wear opposing
12
adjacent cartilage
12
cartilage
11
implant placement
8
opposing adjacent
8
surrounding cartilage
8
implant
6
hydrospacer
5
wear
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!