Novel findings of an old algorithm: PVC response "Atrial Pace'' initiates atrial arrhythmias in Abbott ICD and CRT-D devices.

Background: Many algorithms have been developed to ensure the safety and accuracy of cardiac implantable electric devices (CIED). A specific algorithm designed to prevent pacemaker induced tachycardia (PMT) after a premature ventricular complex (PVC response) is available in all Abbott (former St. Jude Medical) CIED. However, a few case reports suggest that this algorithm may be proarrhythmic when programmed to Atrial Pace (A-Pace on PVC).

Methods: We analyzed the data of all (n = 333) Abbot implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization defibrillator (CRT-D) devices followed remote using the Merlin.net Patient Care Network in our institute in 2020. Status of the PVC response algorithm A-Pace on PVC or Off was collected, and all atrial mode switch (AMS) episodes longer than 30 s were thoroughly evaluated. Data on clinical characteristics of the patients was collect from the electronic patient records.

Results: A total of 173 patients had A-Pace on PVC and twenty-five of them (14%) had at least one atrial high rate episode (AHRE) >30 s (AHRE) triggered by the action of this algorithm. The median PVC count was higher in patients who had algorithm triggered AHRE than in those with no algorithm-triggered AHRE (1.7% [IQR 0-3.2] vs. 0% [IQR 0-1.1], p < .0001). The major clinical characteristics were comparable in the two groups.

Conclusion: The A-Pace on PVC setting was frequently used in our patients. Our study shows that a considerable number of patients had at least one AHRE triggered by the algorithm. The use of this algorithm should be carefully reconsidered.