A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

High accuracy of recombinant fusion protein early secretory antigenic target protein 6-culture filtrate protein 10 skin test for the detection of tuberculosis infection: a phase III, multi-centered, double-blind, hospital-based, randomized controlled trial. | LitMetric

Objectives: To verify the diagnostic utility of recombinant fusion protein ESAT6-CPF10 (EC), a novel skin test reagent to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection.

Methods: A multi-centered, double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted from December 17, 2015, to March 2, 2018. Participants involved in this study included those with active tuberculosis (TB), suspected pulmonary TB, or non-TB pulmonary disease. Each participant received three tests simultaneously, TB-specific enzyme-linked immunospot assay (T-SPOT.TB), tuberculin skin test (TST), and EC skin test (ECST), and adverse events were reported.

Results: Diagnostic accuracy was analyzed using data from 1085 protocol-compliant participants. The sensitivities of the ECST, TST, and T-SPOT.TB were 91.2% (95% CI, 89.0-93.2%), 91.4% (95% CI, 89.1-93.3%), and 92.1% (95% CI, 89.9-93.9%), respectively. The specificities of the ECST (69.7%, 95% CI, 64.5-74.5%) and T-SPOT.TB (76.1%, 95% CI, 71.2-80.5%) were significantly higher than the TST (54.4%, 95% CI, 48.9-59.7%). The agreements between ECST and TST (kappa = 0.632) and between ECST and T-SPOT.TB (kappa = 0.780) were substantial. No severe adverse event was reported.

Conclusion: The diagnostic performance of the ECST was close to the T-SPOT.TB assay in the detection of TB infection and indicated good potential for clinical application in common scenarios.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2022.11.014DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

skin test
16
recombinant fusion
8
fusion protein
8
multi-centered double-blind
8
randomized controlled
8
controlled trial
8
ecst tst
8
ecst
6
95%
6
t-spottb
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!