Two different techniques for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) have been developed: classical pull-through and direct puncture techniques. This study compared the complication rate for both techniques in a large retrospective patient cohort.  Clinical data from patients who received a PEG in four high-volume centers for endoscopy were included retrospectively between January 2016 and December 2018. Patient characteristics and complication rates were correlated in univariate and multivariate analyses.  Data from 1014 patients undergoing a PEG insertion by the pull-through technique were compared to 183 patients for whom the direct puncture technique was used. The direct puncture technique was associated with a 50 % reduction in minor and 85.7 % reduction in major complications when compared to the pull-through technique. Multivariate analysis of these data revealed an odds ratio of 0.067 (0.02-0.226;  < 0.001) for major complications in the direct puncture group. Compared to the pull-through technique, the direct puncture technique resulted in a significant reduction in complications. Despite the retrospective design of this study, these results suggest that the direct puncture technique may be preferable to improve patient safety.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9666075PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1924-3525DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

direct puncture
16
complication rates
8
techniques percutaneous
8
percutaneous endoscopic
8
endoscopic gastrostomy
8
pull-through technique
8
puncture technique
8
direct
4
rates direct
4
puncture
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!