HIV Exposure Prophylaxis Delivery in a Low-barrier Substance Use Disorder Bridge Clinic during a Local HIV Outbreak at the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

J Addict Med

Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA (HMB, CW); Addiction Medicine Fellowship, Department of Medicine, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI (HMB); Department of Pharmacy, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA (NF); Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA (NF); Center for Health Promotion and Health Equity, Brown University, Providence, RI (KBB); Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI (KBB); Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI (KBB); The Fenway Institute, Fenway Health, Boston, MA (KBB); and Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA (JLT).

Published: November 2022

Objectives: People who inject drugs (PWID) may experience high human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) risk and inadequate access to biomedical HIV prevention. Emerging data support integrating HIV post-exposure and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PEP, PrEP) into services already accessed by PWID. We describe PEP/PrEP eligibility and receipt in a low-barrier substance use disorder bridge clinic located in an area experiencing an HIV outbreak among PWID at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: Retrospective chart review of new patients at a substance use disorder bridge clinic in Boston, MA (January 15, 2020-May 15, 2020) to determine rates of PEP/PrEP eligibility and prescribing.

Results: Among 204 unique HIV-negative patients, 85.7% were assessed for injection-related and 23.0% for sexual HIV risk behaviors. Overall, 55/204 (27.0%) met CDC criteria for HIV exposure prophylaxis, including 7/204 (3.4%) for PEP and 48/204 (23.5%) for PrEP. Four of 7 PEP-eligible patients were offered PEP and all 4 were prescribed PEP. Thirty-two of 48 PrEP eligible patients were offered PrEP, and 7/48 (14.6%) were prescribed PrEP. Additionally, 6 PWID were offered PrEP who lacked formal CDC criteria.

Conclusions: Bridge clinics patients have high rates of PEP/PrEP eligibility. The majority of patients with identified eligibility were offered PEP/PrEP, suggesting that upstream interventions that increase HIV risk assessment may support programs in initiating PEP/PrEP care. Additional work is needed to understand why patients declined PEP/PrEP. PrEP offers to PWID who did not meet CDC criteria also suggested provider concern regarding the sensitivity of CDC criteria among PWID. Overall, bridge clinics offer a potential opportunity to increase biomedical HIV prevention service delivery.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9653062PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000000991DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

substance disorder
12
disorder bridge
12
bridge clinic
12
hiv risk
12
pep/prep eligibility
12
cdc criteria
12
hiv
10
hiv exposure
8
exposure prophylaxis
8
low-barrier substance
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!