A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Developing a machine learning prediction algorithm for early differentiation of urosepsis from urinary tract infection. | LitMetric

Objectives: Early recognition and timely intervention for urosepsis are key to reducing morbidity and mortality. Blood culture has low sensitivity, and a long turnaround time makes meeting the needs of clinical diagnosis difficult. This study aimed to use biomarkers to build a machine learning model for early prediction of urosepsis.

Methods: Through retrospective analysis, we screened 157 patients with urosepsis and 417 patients with urinary tract infection. Laboratory data of the study participants were collected, including data on biomarkers, such as procalcitonin, D-dimer, and C-reactive protein. We split the data into training (80%) and validation datasets (20%) and determined the average model prediction accuracy through cross-validation.

Results: In total, 26 variables were initially screened and 18 were statistically significant. The influence of the 18 variables was sorted using three ranking methods to further determine the best combination of variables. The Gini importance ranking method was found to be suitable for variable filtering. The accuracy rates of the six machine learning models in predicting urosepsis were all higher than 80%, and the performance of the artificial neural network (ANN) was the best among all. When the ANN included the eight biomarkers with the highest influence ranking, its model had the best prediction performance, with an accuracy rate of 92.9% and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.946.

Conclusions: Urosepsis can be predicted using only the top eight biomarkers determined by the ranking method. This data-driven predictive model will enable clinicians to make quick and accurate diagnoses.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2022-1006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

machine learning
12
urinary tract
8
tract infection
8
ranking method
8
urosepsis
5
developing machine
4
prediction
4
learning prediction
4
prediction algorithm
4
algorithm early
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!