The impact of primary repair timing on longitudinal visual outcomes after open globe injury.

Background: The urgency with which to repair open globe injuries is a debated topic that lacks grounding in longitudinal visual outcomes data. We aim to test the association between primary repair timing and visual recovery potential following OGI.

Subjects/methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of medical records from a US academic medical center (7/2017 to 11/2021). We included all patients with a principal diagnosis of OGI, a documented date and time of injury, presentation, repair, and ≥ 3 months of complete follow-up data on visual outcomes. We excluded those with prior OGI in the same eye. We also tested the correlation of injury to repair time (ITR) in hours with best corrected visual acuity (BCVA, in logMAR units) at last follow-up in the general cohort and select subpopulations and the impact of repair delay on visual improvement over the follow-up period.

Results: One hundred twenty-nine patients with OGI were analyzed (91 patients with ≥ 3 months of follow-up). The majority were male (105/129, 81%) with a median age of 45 years. Most OGI involved zone 1 (57%), followed by zone 3 (24%), and zone 2 injuries (19%). Median ocular trauma score (OTS) was 60 (IQR 37-70); mean presenting BCVA was logMAR 1.9 (median 2.3, IQR 1.0-2.7). Median ITR was 22 h (IQR 15-30 h, range 5-199 h). ITR time did not significantly correlate with final BCVA (n = 91, β = - 0.003, 95% CI - 0.009-0.002, P = 0.233), nor did it significantly increase the odds of developing ocular complications or requiring secondary ocular surgeries (OR 0.985, 95% CI 0.967-1.002, P = 0.085). Additionally, the rate of BCVA improvement over subsequent months of follow-up did not significantly differ based on ITR time. Presenting BCVA (R = 0.701, P < 0.001) and OTS (R = 0.477, P < 0.001) significantly correlated with final BCVA, independent of repair delays.

Conclusions: In this cohort of OGI patients, repair timing does not significantly correlate with final BCVA, and delays beyond 24 h do not significantly correlate with worse visual recovery potential. Repair time alone should be emphasized to a lesser extent as a prognosticator of visual potential, in favor of significant predictors such as the ocular trauma score and presenting visual acuity.