Purpose: There is currently no consensus on nonoperative management in adult patients after a stable type B ankle fracture. The aim of this review is to compare a removable orthosis versus a cast regarding safety and functional outcome in the NOM of stable type B ankle fractures.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed using randomized clinical trials and observational studies. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed with the methodological index for non-randomized studies instrument. Nonoperative management was compared using the number of complications and functional outcome measured using the Olerud and Molander Score (OMAS) or the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Ankle Score.

Results: Five studies were included. Two were randomized clinical trials, and three were observational studies, including a total of 516 patients. A meta-analysis showed statistically significant higher odds of developing complications in the cast group [odds ratio (OR), 4.67 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.52-14.35)]. Functional outcome in OMAS did not vary significantly at 6 weeks, mean difference (MD) - 6.64 (95% CI - 13.72 to + 0.45), and at 12 weeks, MD - 6.91 (95% CI - 18.73 to + 4.91). The mean difference of functional outcome in OMAS at 26 weeks or longer was significantly better in the removable orthosis group; MD - 2.63 (95% CI - 5.01 to - 0.25).

Conclusion: Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis show that a removable orthosis is a safe alternative type of NOM, as complication numbers are significantly lower in the orthosis group. In addition, no statistically significant differences were found in terms of functional outcome between a removable orthosis and a cast at 6 and 12 weeks. The 6-week and the 26-week OMAS results show that in patients with stable type B ankle fractures, a removable orthosis is non-inferior to a cast in terms of functional outcome.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10520166PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02169-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

removable orthosis
24
functional outcome
24
stable type
16
type ankle
16
systematic review
12
review meta-analysis
12
ankle fractures
8
nonoperative management
8
patients stable
8
randomized clinical
8

Similar Publications

Background: Treatment of diabetes and its complications is a primary health care expense. Up to 25% of people with diabetes will develop diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). Removable cast walker (RCW) boots commonly prescribed for DFU treatment, promote healing, and provide offloading and wound protection.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The standard treatment for the conservative management of a proximal phalanx fracture of the little finger involves immobilizing the fracture site with a cast. However, cast immobilization presents challenges in maintaining hygiene during treatment and restricts the fine motor movements of the fingers. In this study, we developed a removable orthosis that immobilizes only the ring and little fingers.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

To summarize and analyze clinical characteristics of pediatric mandibular condylar fractures and the long-term therapeutic effects of closed treatment. A retrospective study was conducted for pediatric condylar fracture in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology from October 2015 to October 2019, including 33 males (67.3%) and 16 females (32.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Pressure offloading is a critical component of plantar foot ulcer management, including diabetes-related foot ulcers (DFU). Conventional offloading options such as total contact casting and removable knee-high walkers may be unsuitable or unsuccessful in patients with morbid obesity, intermittent lower limb oedema, high exudative wounds or poor mobility. A mouldable fibreglass backslab device (BSD) may be a practical alternative to be considered in these situations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study investigates how specific genetic variations (SNPs) in the COMT and OPRM1 genes affect treatment responses in patients suffering from temporomandibular disorders (TMDp), particularly focusing on pain intensity, mouth opening, and anxiety levels.
  • In a group of 60 TMDp patients who received standardized treatment over six months, those with minor allele variants showed less improvement in pain reduction and anxiety compared to those with dominant homozygous variants.
  • The results suggest that genetic factors may help predict treatment outcomes in TMDp patients, implying that genotype assessment could be valuable in tailoring treatment strategies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!