Introduction: Sodium picosulfate plus magnesium citrate is a bowel preparation agent with high patient acceptability. However, it is unclear which patients are more likely to have inadequate bowel preparation when using this agent. This study aimed to identify the risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation when using sodium picosulfate plus magnesium citrate for colonoscopy and to develop a scoring model to predict which patients will have inadequate bowel preparation.
Methods: A total of 350 Japanese patients were enrolled from June 2021 to April 2022. Data on patient background, details of colonoscopy, and satisfaction assessment questionnaire results were prospectively collected. The scoring model for inadequate bowel preparation was developed based on multiple logistic regression analyses, and its performance was internally validated using bootstrapping.
Results: Adequate bowel preparation was obtained in 295 patients (84.3%); 335 (95.7%) were able to ingest the drug without difficulty. The scoring model consisted of five independent risk factors and points of risk scores were assigned to each one as follows: American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status III (1 point), diabetes comorbidities (5 points), use of laxatives (4 points), no defecation once in a day (2 points), and drug use for mental disorder (6 points). The C-statistics of the scoring system for inadequate bowel preparation was 0.75.
Discussion: We identified five risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation when using sodium picosulfate plus magnesium citrate regimen and developed a scoring model for inadequate bowel preparation with satisfactory discrimination and calibration.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000527312 | DOI Listing |
Am J Ther
January 2025
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN.
JMIR Hum Factors
January 2025
School of Nursing, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Room B631, No. 365, Ming-te Road, Peitou District, Taipei City, 11219, Taiwan, 886 2 28227101 ext 3186.
Background: Colonoscopy is the standard diagnostic method for colorectal cancer. Patients usually receive written and verbal instructions for bowel preparation (BP) before the procedure. Failure to understand the importance of BP can lead to inadequate BP in 25%-30% of patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSci Rep
January 2025
Nursing Department, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Building 17, 3rd Floor 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China.
The quality of bowel preparation is an important factor in the success of colonoscopy. However, multiple influencing factors that function together can lead to inadequate bowel preparation. The main objective of this study was to explore the specific factors that affect the quality of bowel preparation, with the goal of deriving and validating a predictive model for inadequate bowel preparation in Chinese outpatients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRev Esp Enferm Dig
January 2025
Gastroenterology, Yokkaichi Municipal Hospital.
Background: Colorectal obstruction is a critical condition requiring prompt diagnosis and intervention. Gastrografin, a water-soluble contrast agent, combines diagnostic and therapeutic benefits, facilitating bowel cleansing and enhancing intestinal motility. This study assessed the safety and effectiveness of Gastrografin enemas in emergency settings.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnn Surg
January 2025
Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Boston, MA, USA.
Objective: To explore the association of socioeconomic status (SES) and race/ethnicity with perioperative metrics within the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) framework to identify gaps for equity-informed improvements.
Summary Background Data: Although ERAS pathways improve perioperative outcomes through standardized care, disparities in protocol adherence and postoperative outcomes persist, particularly for vulnerable populations.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a single-institution database of elective colorectal surgeries (2018-2021).
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!